Colin, can you give a perspective in how you view Chief's role here? I must admit that I am trying to establish a standpoint in my own mind in how far Chief had the ability and responsibility to communicate as an official representative of the game or not. How do you see his capacity here?
Sure. Chief has consistently said he does not want to be accused of mis-leading anyone and so has chosen not to answer various questions (including release date) on that basis.
Chief is the producer which is an important role but at the same time he works for 505 games (freelance) and they get to decide the timeline for releasing game information, assets etc. I see Chief as being here as a gamer and a fan who decided to try and make this game better by using our expertise. Remember that we worked with Chief and Transmission to create the AC09 patch that formed the basis of IC10. How far the ideas here are able to be incorporated is anyone's guess. Trickstar are clearly working under greater timescale and financial pressure than Big Ant.
I agree that my perspective on Chief may be coloured by the fact that I've known him and chatted to him about cricket gaming for 6 years or more but I would still criticise him if I believed he had himself deliberately misled us.
Mike Fegan may have misled us; 505 games may have done so but I don't know how or where Chief has.