By the way, AngryPixel, here are the Dravid v Tendulkar stats, since I feel compelled to destroy your argument now itself.
2000: Dravid 78 vs. Tendulkar 64
2001: Dravid 47 vs. Tendulkar 63
2002: Dravid 59 vs. Tendulkar 56
2003: Dravid 100 vs. Tendulkar 17
2004: Dravid 63 vs. Tendulkar 92
2005: Dravid 53 vs. Tendulkar 44
2006: Dravid 61 vs. Tendulkar 24
2007: Dravid 36 vs. Tendulkar 55
2008: Dravid 31 vs. Tendulkar 48
2009: Dravid 83 vs. Tendulkar 68
2010: Dravid 36 vs. Tendulkar 90
So the total breakdown is:
Dravid -- 6 years
Tendulkar - 5 years
Furthermore, if you take a look at the following periods:
2000-2003: Dravid 63, Sachin 52
2000-2004: Dravid 63, Sachin 59
So essentially in the first 5 years of the last decade, Dravid outscored Tendulkar by as much as 11 runs an innings to as little as 4 runs per inning over a 5-year period.
If you don't see how Dravid was easily the best batsman in our team for a large part of the last decade, you are just one more of a number of Indians who think the buck stops at Sachin.