I don't care if they feature in both or feature in neither, if they are more than 2/3rds of the way down the list they aren't really big match players. They've just played in finals.
I don't care if they feature in both or feature in neither, if they are more than 2/3rds of the way down the list they aren't really big match players. They've just played in finals.
I think Bevan and Kirsten are easily outperformed by Tendulkar and Richards because of the strike rate factor. Both Tendulkar and Richards have strike rates above 85, which is marvelous. Whereas Bevan and Kirsten have strike rates below 75.
@BB, the strike rate factors are going to be different for a few different reasons, whilst the stats show they did well in finals it doesn't tell you the context like where they came in, the score when they came in or even where they were playing.
@BB, the strike rate factors are going to be different for a few different reasons, whilst the stats show they did well in finals it doesn't tell you the context like where they came in, the score when they came in or even where they were playing.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.