Cricket 19 General Discussion

Look into? You do realize the game is about to be released in about 2 months' time, don't you? It would be unrealistic to expect any changes that are likely to be significant. Maybe cosmetic at best.
I just pointed few issues which may be just adjusted before cricket 19 i am no one to tell them they will do what they think is the best.
I have mentioned negetives of ashes hope they are not part of cricket19.
These issues are not seen today its there from the release date of ashes and i am sure big ant knows about this i just mentioned of few things can be corrected last moment.
And provide us with a dedicated cricket 19 server for online.
2vs 2 is too much to ask so i dont want it.
 
Simple can you increase the height of warner or smith.
In cummunity there are hundred smith but you cant increase height that way.
Smith and Warner are locked for editing because of the license.

H

How can kohli be 220 cm in community that what i mean.
Because someone wants Kohli to be a taller?

In Ashes a lot of players in the academy are not the same height as the real life counterpart. In some cases there are players that are 1 foot (30cm) shorter than the real life equivalent. What if someone downloads a player whose height has been corrected? Can they not use that player online at all?
 
I'm super pumped for this new game 'Cricket 19' constantly checking the web every few minutes consuming my daily life to see if any new info has been revealed. Can't wait till the game is released so I can get straight into it and check out all the features. Not long to go now, only about two months left till release. Apparently we should get some more details soon, hopefully some good news which I'm sure it will be.
 
I
How can you limit the height of players on a game that is 95% dependent upon custom content? You could make online play only have licensed teams but I doubt people would like that. Or you could make online game only use on-disk players with original appearances and skills but given that those things in Ashes were wildly inconsistent, if the same was to be the case in C17, I don't know if people would be happy with that either. And is Mohammad Irfan not allowed to play?

The same goes for limiting the number of changes to bowlers. I suppose there could be a 'track changes' that records alterations from an on-disk player to an edited player. But how many changes should be allowed? Is increasing by 1 skill point considered one change? Would a change register for every editing session even if you just increased one skill by one point?

While I don't use the aerial marker I've never had a problem playing front foot shots - pulls at least on short balls. Maybe you need to adjust the player height in order to be able to play them. If a player is too small/too tall the range of playing the shot is going to be limited because of the mo-cap. Maybe this will be changed in C17.

Mattw has said that fielding has been worked on, with added motion capture work. So in terms of dropped catches and fielding in general, hopefully these will be a things of the past.

A lot of the problems seems to be not with the game but with the people you play against. That's a part of online gaming in general. Players don't play the way you play, or the way you want them to play or expect them to play. Some people want realism, some people want to win at all costs, some people want to have fun. People are dicks.

It seems like the best way to go for a game like this is to find people who feel the same way as you and create your own community of players based on certain rules and principles. If it's a success people will want to join and want to adhere to those rules. If they don't, you can kick them out.
Smith and Warner are locked for editing because of the license.

Because someone wants Kohli to be a taller?

In Ashes a lot of players in the academy are not the same height as the real life counterpart. In some cases there are players that are 1 foot (30cm) shorter than the real life equivalent. What if someone downloads a player whose height has been corrected? Can they not use that player online at all?
Smith and Warner are locked for editing because of the license.

Because someone wants Kohli to be a taller?

In Ashes a lot of players in the academy are not the same height as the real life counterpart. In some cases there are players that are 1 foot (30cm) shorter than the real life equivalent. What if someone downloads a player whose height has been corrected? Can they not use that player online at all?
Truely said but are you aware every star player we create or edit and share in community it take 3 to 4 days of approval then only the player will not show cencered.
So any alteration of height weight should not be approved.
But can any one create warner or smith 220 cm no as they are licensed.

Create players feature is great create new players as manny of 500 cm its ok and keep it in consoles or steam.But online those should show cencered.
Today 220 cm ambrose also does not show cencered as it approved.
I am just talking about height and weight not skills of players of the cricketing world.
Wasteyouryouth can be 1 cm to 500 cm cool no issue but it will show cencered.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I



Truely said but are you aware every star player we create or edit and share in community it take 3 to 4 days of approval then only the player will not show cencered.
So any alteration of height weight should not be approved.
But can any one create warner or smith 220 cm no as they are licensed.

Create players feature is great create new players as manny of 500 cm its ok and keep it in consoles or steam.But online those should show cencered.
Today 220 cm ambrose also does not show cencered as it approved.
I've edited and shared one or two players and I've never come across the need for any to be approved. Is this a thing that happens for online now or a suggestion for how it should work? In which case who does the approval, someone at Big Ant? They're a small company, as someone who buys their games, I'd rather all their resources were directed to developing and improving the games they make instead of policing custom content - which they support and rely upon.

Like you said there are hundreds of Smiths in the academy, which could mean there are hundreds of every player - does someone have to check the height and approve every single version of every player? Assuming you don't want bowling speeds at 0 too then they would have to check that as well.
 
I've edited and shared one or two players and I've never come across the need for any to be approved. Is this a thing that happens for online now or a suggestion for how it should work? In which case who does the approval, someone at Big Ant? They're a small company, as someone who buys their games, I'd rather all their resources were directed to developing and improving the games they make instead of policing custom content - which they support and rely upon.

Like you said there are hundreds of Smiths in the academy, which could mean there are hundreds of every player - does someone have to check the height and approve every single version of every player? Assuming you don't want bowling speeds at 0 too then they would have to check that as well.
Ok sir can i take the liberty to explain you sir.
You create J.Bird 220 cm
Weight 160
And share it on 10 march
I downloaded it on 10 march it shows cencered when we play online.
But if i download J.Bird from your id on 15 march it does not show censered.
So i guess someone is there approving the players created also there is a option where you can report against a player created in community.
So i feel cricketers from criketing world and custom players should not be mixed and as play face feature hitting in cricket 19.
Licensed or non licensed with play face we will be close to like a full licensed game indirectly.
Editing may spoil it so atleast height and weight should be locked.
Custom player any thing allowed 1 to 500 cm also ok.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ok sir can i take the liberty to explain you sir.
You create J.Bird 220 cm
Weight 160
And share it on 10 march
I downloaded it on 10 march it shows cencered.
But if i download J.Bird from your id on 15 march it does not show censered.
So i guess someone is there approving the players created also there is a option where you can report against a player created in community.
You can already report players created in the community.
 
I've edited and shared one or two players and I've never come across the need for any to be approved. Is this a thing that happens for online now or a suggestion for how it should work? In which case who does the approval, someone at Big Ant? They're a small company, as someone who buys their games, I'd rather all their resources were directed to developing and improving the games they make instead of policing custom content - which they support and rely upon.

Like you said there are hundreds of Smiths in the academy, which could mean there are hundreds of every player - does someone have to check the height and approve every single version of every player? Assuming you don't want bowling speeds at 0 too then they would have to check that as well.
They need not check the sliders locked at 50 for bowlers while editing a bowler or recreating a star player any country like the lock sign on licensed players.
No one needs to approve smith as auto locked no one can increase height or weight with play face coming it should be maintained with every star player irrespective the player of which country will solve the issue.
I am only speaking on height and weight.
50 sliders locked for bowlers
Skills ok to edit.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
They need not check the sliders locked at 50 for bowlers while editing a bowler or recreating a star player any country like the lock sign on licensed players.
No one needs to approve smith as auto locked no one can increase height or weight with play face coming it should be maintained with ever star player irrespective the player of which country will solve the issue.
I am only speaking on height and weight.
50 sliders locked for bowlers
Skills ok to edit.
Star players like Virat Kohli are not in the game (unless BA drop the bombshell that they've got licenses for India or more teams). There is a player called Vasiga Kallis who has a lot of similarities to Virat Kohli. However the similarities of players like Vasiga Kallis do not always include height and weight. Therefore, if it was me, I would choose to edit them. Does that mean that player cannot then be used online?

If you can't edit those things then you will end up with a lot of inaccuracies. Will you be happy if Jason Holder was, in error, set at 170cm but you couldn't edit that to 201cm? Play face doesn't mean players become magically licensed it will only change the appearance of the player's face.

If there isn't already, perhaps online players should be given their own block list. So, if you come across someone who uses players that you aren't happy with or plays in a particular way that makes you unhappy, you can add them to that list and you won't be matched to play with them again.
 
As
You can already report players created in the community.
Ashes is history no point reporting wasting time and its a dead game price wise and game wise.
Lets look forward to cricket 19.
I made a point its not about argument or the superiority that you are asking me to report.
Thanks anyways
 
Star players like Virat Kohli are not in the game (unless BA drop the bombshell that they've got licenses for India or more teams). There is a player called Vasiga Kallis who has a lot of similarities to Virat Kohli. However the similarities of players like Vasiga Kallis do not always include height and weight. Therefore, if it was me, I would choose to edit them. Does that mean that player cannot then be used online?

If you can't edit those things then you will end up with a lot of inaccuracies. Will you be happy if Jason Holder was, in error, set at 170cm but you couldn't edit that to 201cm? Play face doesn't mean players become magically licensed it will only change the appearance of the player's face.

If there isn't already, perhaps online players should be given their own block list. So, if you come across someone who uses players that you aren't happy with or plays in a particular way that makes you unhappy, you can add them to that list and you won't be matched to play with them again.
True said but vasiga should have virats height and weight.
Check all past cricket games niether had all teams license names we use to always edit.
2 points
1.You dont want to understand the point.
2.or you want to prove only you are right no one can match you.
Anyways thanks for spending time to answer me back.
Cheers
 
Star players like Virat Kohli are not in the game (unless BA drop the bombshell that they've got licenses for India or more teams). There is a player called Vasiga Kallis who has a lot of similarities to Virat Kohli. However the similarities of players like Vasiga Kallis do not always include height and weight. Therefore, if it was me, I would choose to edit them. Does that mean that player cannot then be used online?

If you can't edit those things then you will end up with a lot of inaccuracies. Will you be happy if Jason Holder was, in error, set at 170cm but you couldn't edit that to 201cm? Play face doesn't mean players become magically licensed it will only change the appearance of the player's face.

If there isn't already, perhaps online players should be given their own block list. So, if you come across someone who uses players that you aren't happy with or plays in a particular way that makes you unhappy, you can add them to that list and you won't be matched to play with them again.
No issue what you said is true so the community creates 1 virat kohli his height and weight locked which we replace thats what i mean sir and we can manipulate with the skills and batting style.
 
Anyways lets change the topic are we seeing any new screenshots today its sunday.
How about few womens players screen shot.
Womens day just passed away.
 
As

Ashes is history no point reporting wasting time and its a dead game price wise and game wise.
Lets look forward to cricket 19.
I made a point its not about argument or the superiority that you are asking me to report.
Thanks anyways
So why are you referring to problems about a dead game in a forum about Cricket 19?
True said but vasiga should have virats height and weight.
Check all past cricket games niether had all teams license names we use to always edit.
2 points
1.You dont want to understand the point.
2.or you want to prove only you are right no one can match you.
Anyways thanks for spending time to answer me back.
Cheers
I definitely understand your point so it must be number 2.

Seriously though, I'm not trying to prove I'm right, I'm pointing out what I consider to be flaws in your proposals. I don't work for Big Ant so my opinion is not important. So you can hope that someone who does work for Big Ant sees your suggestions and doesn't have the same reservations I do and implements restrictions on editing.

No issue what you said is true so the community creates 1 virat kohli his height and weight locked which we replace thats what i mean sir and we can manipulare with the skills and batting style.
Which community? Planet cricket? There are probably people who create content that don't come on this website. Should they be excluded? How do you decide which member of the community is given the honour to create the one and only Virat Kohli? And who makes that decision? And how is that fair on other creators or people that want to use other versions Virat Kolhi?
 
Sir have u played ultimate team fifa and you saying this strange.
Star players like Virat Kohli are not in the game (unless BA drop the bombshell that they've got licenses for India or more teams). There is a player called Vasiga Kallis who has a lot of similarities to Virat Kohli. However the similarities of players like Vasiga Kallis do not always include height and weight. Therefore, if it was me, I would choose to edit them. Does that mean that player cannot then be used online?

If you can't edit those things then you will end up with a lot of inaccuracies. Will you be happy if Jason Holder was, in error, set at 170cm but you couldn't edit that to 201cm? Play face doesn't mean players become magically licensed it will only change the appearance of the player's face.

If there isn't already, perhaps online players should be given their own block list. So, if you come across someone who uses players that you aren't happy with or plays in a particular way that makes you unhappy, you can add them to that list and you won't be matched to play with them again.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top