Cricket 19 General Discussion

[Mitchell]

On Hard Legend But score on TEST , Very easy on hard

View attachment 225848

View attachment 225849

Try hardest and that can’t be legend sorry mate

 

[Kiko_97]

Please help, players only have plain bats.. means, no stickers on the bat. now found an option to assign the bat individually. so i need to apply bats for each and every player or is there any source to get all bats updated?

What console?

 

[swacker]

I have noticed that some people on here won't hear any criticism of BA, however reasoned and informed that may be.

Well said.

 

[DAP]

Try hardest and that can’t be legend sorry mate

From my experience it can be legend. AI Legend Bowling can get beaten quite easily. Though yes, if one goes hardest very hard to score.[DOUBLEPOST=1565512611][/DOUBLEPOST]

On Hard Legend But score on TEST , Very easy on hard

View attachment 225848

View attachment 225849

I presume you're Batting! Try hardest, you might have a more realistic experience.

 

[Gamefroggy]

Even on Veteran with some tweaked sliders I find it very challenging to bat.

 

[Wealey]

Well said.

It’s not that.. there’s plenty of faults.

Most of it is repeated over and over by the same people.

And some people do just talk utter rubbish.

@fezza

No one here is paid or works for BA so there’s no allegiance to them in any way.

 

[chintoo02018]

@DAP , @Nathan Goat Lyon

Shorter Form on Hard mode and longer hardest ,

Now in Career which will be good to start

 

[Dutch]

Are you on paid BA staff?

Literally, any criticism, even if it's thought out well, and you come down with something sarcastic or clever.

When you're playing, what, fourth iteration, years down the line, and there isn't pitch wear (I think Cricket 97 had pitch wear, certainly BLIC2005 did), it is reasonable to ask if the developers know the game.

We have a decent cricket game, we feel we should have a better cricket game.

Are you Ross in disguise?

Its always interesting to see this argument banded about: to counter the fact that someone might have criticism of the criticism I am pushed into the very same corner as where I am being critisized for apparently pushing people into ie the corner of absolutism. I have some criticism of the way some people vent their frustration thus I must work for ba or in fact be Ross himself. I refer the right honorable gentleman to my previous answer: this place is full of bollocks.

To go into more depth: my comment about the bollocks has nothing to do with the criticism of ba and the fixes that should have happened or fixes that break stuff and are left to fester. That criticism is imo very valid if worded based on actual facts, which there are.

The fact that it then spirals out into world economics and conspiracy theories I call bollocks and stand by that comment.

However I stand by everybodies right to talk bollocks if they wish, including my own right there in.


There are hundreds of pages of criticism in this thread alone: to state that I have commented on “literally any criticism” is factually incorrect.

 

[swacker]

I refer the right honorable gentleman to my previous answer: this place is full of bollocks.

Rightly so and I don't see a point in you referring it again and again w/ such sarcasm. It still goes on.

 

[Dutch]

Rightly so and I don't see a point in you referring it again and again w/ such sarcasm. It still goes on.

For the one it is apparently sarcasm, bitter and offensive. For the other it is playful banter. For myself I like to consider it falling into that second category.

 

[wasteyouryouth]

Its always interesting to see this argument banded about: to counter the fact that someone might have criticism of the criticism I am pushed into the very same corner as where I am being critisized for apparently pushing people into ie the corner of absolutism. I have some criticism of the way some people vent their frustration thus I must work for ba or in fact be Ross himself. I refer the right honorable gentleman to my previous answer: this place is full of bollocks.

To go into more depth: my comment about the bollocks has nothing to do with the criticism of ba and the fixes that should have happened or fixes that break stuff and are left to fester. That criticism is imo very valid if worded based on actual facts, which there are.

The fact that it then spirals out into world economics and conspiracy theories I call bollocks and stand by that comment.

However I stand by everybodies right to talk bollocks If they wish, including my own right there in.

Your cheque is in the mail.

You can say what you want now.

 

[swacker]

For the one it is apparently sarcasm, bitter and offensive. For the other it is playful banter. For myself I like to consider it falling into that second category.

There is no point, is what I mean.

 

[Wealey]

There is no point, is what I mean.

Also absolutely no point banging on and on about the same thing either..

At all

@Dutch Is sarcastic tries not to be too serious on a cricket forum.

Some come on here and vent their frustrations over a game and make it sound like it’s the end of the world and it’s life and death.

Each to their own

 

[swacker]

Also absolutely no point banging on and on about the same thing either..

At all

Well I hope you are sensible enough in not banging it on while others do.

Either way, it still goes on. Nevermind.

 

[swacker]

Some come on here and vent their frustrations over a game and make it sound like it’s the end of the world and it’s life and death.

tbh, the game could have been better. There are a lot of same features that have been extracted from Ashes Cricket 2017, it's just that the expectations fire up when the game gets good from previous versions.

However I do like to see people tend to explain it properly.