I just played cricket 22 on my 55 inch OLED TV with HDMi 2.1 PS5 version and it looks great, not sure why people were complaining about graphics because I think it looks fantastic.
The point is you can show off hours of game play, build hype and still release a game that was so broken Sony wouldn't sell it (and I believe still has a disclaimer that you should not buy it). So what difference does showing gameplay really make? If that's critical to deciding on whether or not someone purchases a game then wait until its released before buying.Does not really have anything to do with Cricket 22 does it? Surely you agree no gameplay before a games release is not a good sign? You cant go 30 seconds of gameplay without a bug or something looking completely off.
I would say it is critical that people would see this game is worse than Cricket 19 so far and instead wait for this game to get fixed or go on sale before buying. Obviously people would like a complete game on release, is that not fair to assume? Its not on the consumer to not buy something, its on Big Ant to not release a buggy unfinished mess.The point is you can show off hours of game play, build hype and still release a game that was so broken Sony wouldn't sell it (and I believe still has a disclaimer that you should not buy it). So what difference does showing gameplay really make? If that's critical to deciding on whether or not someone purchases a game then wait until its released before buying.
Same is true on PC.Anyone on ps5 able to play a forward defensive on the off side?
as you can see here I can play attacking shots to the off side but not defensive.
tried with 2 controllers.
they made a cricket game without a forward defensive. Let that sink in.
I waited till after release and that's why I'm not buying.If that's critical to deciding on whether or not someone purchases a game then wait until its released before buying.
Even stadium creator is missing ......Where's scenario mode?