Sulaiman7
ICC Chairman
Well, I really like the points Fenil and The Author posted. I think this should be ran the PCGMC way, it's the best way to get fair and democratic results. And yeah, including a staff member as a panelist would be a great thing to do and that person probably is @Samuels. Having this every month will force people to do somethings different from their schedule and might disturb their sleep as well considering that only successful and well presented leagues will qualify. Having this after a month or two should be a better idea.
The PCGMC way would lead to fair results as not only the member will vote but the panelists will also rate the league and the entries will be awarded according to panelists' ratings. This is how the PCGMC way works but there's a way where we can say that the idea is adopted, members may vote for whichever entry they like but the panelists' ratings won't be individual, as The Author said, each member of the committee will select three favourite leagues from the month/or two and if a league is nominated by three or more panellists, it is shortlisted.
Regarding the panelists, I think that we should go for experienced and communicating/helping active members. Having active members should be a fact to be quite honest as a less active member doesn't know how a certain league is being played and what's its base in fact, it will make his job of deciding points and rating hard and since they're not much active, they would lose it.
I think we all confirm VC as a member and I believe VC should decide the other. Just a personal suggestion this is.
The PCGMC way would lead to fair results as not only the member will vote but the panelists will also rate the league and the entries will be awarded according to panelists' ratings. This is how the PCGMC way works but there's a way where we can say that the idea is adopted, members may vote for whichever entry they like but the panelists' ratings won't be individual, as The Author said, each member of the committee will select three favourite leagues from the month/or two and if a league is nominated by three or more panellists, it is shortlisted.
Regarding the panelists, I think that we should go for experienced and communicating/helping active members. Having active members should be a fact to be quite honest as a less active member doesn't know how a certain league is being played and what's its base in fact, it will make his job of deciding points and rating hard and since they're not much active, they would lose it.
I think we all confirm VC as a member and I believe VC should decide the other. Just a personal suggestion this is.