Cricket Leagues - Feedback and Suggestions

For me, highest batsman is 40. Highest domestic batsman who hasn't played international cricket is 34. A random domestic batsman is 30. All-rounders are anywhere between 20 and 40.

Highest bowling is 27. Highest domestic bowler who hasn't played international cricket is 30. A random domestic bowler is 33. All-rounders are between 27 and 40.

Even I follow the same rules in ODI's. But I am rather more stingy in batting averages. I don't give more than 34 to any domestic batsman unless he is very good. I relate the performances in the domestic level and view what he would do st the int. level (mine is a global league so views may differ)
 
I don't know. when I opened the simulator, played a game and got back to the stats one and seen - their isn't any files stored at there.
 
Is there an option available in Cricksim to display the stats in the descending order of runs scored?

When I view the stats, the names are just randomly arranged.
 
For me, highest batsman is 40. Highest domestic batsman who hasn't played international cricket is 34. A random domestic batsman is 30. All-rounders are anywhere between 20 and 40.

Highest bowling is 27. Highest domestic bowler who hasn't played international cricket is 30. A random domestic bowler is 33. All-rounders are between 27 and 40.

I'll just post it in the same format as you:

For me, highest batsman is 40. Highest domestic batsman who hasn't played international cricket is 32. A random domestic batsman is 31. All-rounders are anywhere between 25 and 39 (I don't think I have any all-rounders with 40 batting).

Highest bowling is 27. Highest domestic bowler who hasn't played international cricket is 31. A random domestic bowler is 33. All-rounders are between 27 and 35, then anyone over 35 is classed as a batsman on the first post, not an all-rounder, and the maximum I give them is 43.
 
I'm was just thinking about the new league plans and came upon some thing good which I'll let you all know.

In many leagues there are Drafts to select players. At last all the managers end up with having some Overseas players and rest all Domestic (Locals). Normally, the overseas that chosen are Sachin, Kallis, Steyn and such reputed guys. But, now I'm thinking of some new idea to bring out some players who have talent but are not popular enough. So Everytime, Instead of having those same names we'll get to have to have some different players.

What do you guys think?
Or should I go with the old idea only?

Also, put up your ideas regarding it! New ones are also appreciated

:cheers
 
I'm was just thinking about the new league plans and came upon some thing good which I'll let you all know.

In many leagues there are Drafts to select players. At last all the managers end up with having some Overseas players and rest all Domestic (Locals). Normally, the overseas that chosen are Sachin, Kallis, Steyn and such reputed guys. But, now I'm thinking of some new idea to bring out some players who have talent but are not popular enough. So Everytime, Instead of having those same names we'll get to have to have some different players.

What do you guys think?
Or should I go with the old idea only?

Also, put up your ideas regarding it! New ones are also appreciated

:cheers

Good Idea Mate But How Managers Will Came To Know That Which Players Are Talented And Which Are Not.Do you give them list of those players?
 
That is where grades help, if Good posts them.
 
Umm..I'm actually not getting into grade hierarchy but I'll only post a list of all of them.
 
Hmm, to me this sounds really similar to a league idea I mentioned earlier. I'll sit back and watch and see how this pans out.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top