DBC14 PC Specifications

[MattW]

Nvidia Geforce 210 (1GB)

No.

210 is a lower number than 520.

 

[BittuGamz]

Matt, I have sony laptop with intel core i5, 8 gb ram, nvidia geforce gt 735m 2gb.
Will this work at least for medium settings in the game?

 

[MattW]

That should be fine.

 

[sanjeevaloria]

NVidia Geforce GT720A 1gb

 

[BigAntStudios]

That should be fine.

You really are paying for having that Beta

 

[BittuGamz]

That should be fine.

Wow! Thanks.

 

[kamy100]

I am useless with understanding specifications, below are my laptop specs, would it run DBC on good settings:
Processor (CPU) Intel? Core?i7 Quad Core Mobile Processor i7-3630QM (2.40GHz) 6MB
Memory (RAM) 8GB KINGSTON HYPER-X GENESIS 1600MHz SODIMM DDR3 (2 x
4GB)
Graphics Card NVIDIA? GeForce? GTX 660M - 2.0GB DDR5 Video RAM - DirectX? 11
Memory - 1st Hard Disk 750GB WD SCORPIO BLACK WD7500BPKT, SATA 3 Gb/s, 16MB
CACHE (7200 rpm)

 

[Aditya]

No. It will not run.

I have Intel HD Graphics 4000. I've checked around a few sites, namely Canyourunit and game-debate, going by the results there, my Sony Vaio should be able to run the game. I've tested high-end games like Sleeping Dogs, Virtua Tennis 4 and 3 and L.A. Noire which seem to work fine.

The Demo which I do know must not be set as a parameter for the full version to work but still it worked fine on my laptop (I'm unaware of the FPS). Any idea if Intel HD Graphics 4000 is among the graphic cards that might possibly run the game?

 

[zimrahil]

I am useless with understanding specifications, below are my laptop specs, would it run DBC on good settings:
Processor (CPU) Intel? Core?i7 Quad Core Mobile Processor i7-3630QM (2.40GHz) 6MB
Memory (RAM) 8GB KINGSTON HYPER-X GENESIS 1600MHz SODIMM DDR3 (2 x
4GB)
Graphics Card NVIDIA? GeForce? GTX 660M - 2.0GB DDR5 Video RAM - DirectX? 11
Memory - 1st Hard Disk 750GB WD SCORPIO BLACK WD7500BPKT, SATA 3 Gb/s, 16MB
CACHE (7200 rpm)

No.

this may not be accurate - just like posting above response to everything

 

[MattW]

I have Intel HD Graphics 4000. I've checked around a few sites, namely Canyourunit and game-debate, going by the results there, my Sony Vaio should be able to run the game. I've tested high-end games like Sleeping Dogs, Virtua Tennis 4 and 3 and L.A. Noire which seem to work fine.

Put simply, in the absence of a specific minimum for Intel graphics, I don't want to say 'yes' to any Intel chip.

The Intel HD 4000 chip is better than the Nvidia GT 520 on some benchmarks, but worse than the Radeon HD 6670, which is the AMD/ATI minimum requirement. It would depend strongly on what the specific element of graphical performance is that the game requires, and causes that gap between Nvidia and AMD requirements.

It's certainly not a risk I'd want to take on a game that's likely to be a significant investment. So, based on the specs, no. I'd say based on the chip itself, perhaps, at low settings.

I am useless with understanding specifications, below are my laptop specs, would it run DBC on good settings:

Yes, you might not be able to max it out, but it should certainly be playable.

 

[Aditya]

Put simply, in the absence of a specific minimum for Intel graphics, I don't want to say 'yes' to any Intel chip.

The Intel HD 4000 chip is better than the Nvidia GT 520 on some benchmarks, but worse than the Radeon HD 6670, which is the AMD/ATI minimum requirement. It would depend strongly on what the specific element of graphical performance is that the game requires, and causes that gap between Nvidia and AMD requirements.

It's certainly not a risk I'd want to take on a game that's likely to be a significant investment. So, based on the specs, no. I'd say based on the chip itself, perhaps, at low settings.

Cheers Matt for the detailed reply. The last line is very significantly true to the review tests that I've taken on gaming websites. I've been suggested that the game should run on the low-medium settings on my laptop (taking into considering the specs+the Intel chip).

I did read one of your posts which mentions that if the DBC nets gives you around 30+ FPS then the game should run on low-med settings, if that's so, I'll certainly look for the FPS that I get in the nets. To be on the safer side, 40+ FPS I believe should be minimal for the possibility of full version even running!

 

[MattW]

I did read one of your posts which mentions that if the DBC nets gives you around 30+ FPS then the game should run on low-med settings, if that's so, I'll certainly look for the FPS that I get in the nets. To be on the safer side, 40+ FPS I believe should be minimal for the possibility of full version even running!

The game itself will probably give you 60% of the framerate you get in the nets, based on the difference on my PC.

You want the game running at 60FPS, so you'd need to be getting 90+ in the nets to be comfortable. If you can't get to 60FPS in the nets, give up.

 

[Aditya]

The game itself will probably give you 60% of the framerate you get in the nets, based on the difference on my PC.

You want the game running at 60FPS, so you'd need to be getting 90+ in the nets to be comfortable. If you can't get to 60FPS in the nets, give up.

I'll check the FPS in the demo by today evening. In the worst case scenario, if the game wouldn't work on my laptop, I'm willing to spend a few bucks in buying a good enough graphic card to play this on my PC.

 

[DanDango]

My pc is fine i7-930 6gb ram and 460 gtx but my screen suck lol its and old 19" lcd square screen. I played the demo and I think the game is widescreen only.

 

[MattW]

Correct. Though it will letterbox.