Jaztheman
Chairman of Selectors
Thanks for replying to my post on the end of page 8, Saurav...
Don't be angry if you can't prove KP better. My evidence is just too strong. Let me tell you, instead of posting these useless comments, try to prove my evidence wrong.
Let me ask you. What are stats for? Players get their stats up to become a good cricketer. which means top everyone in the ranking. Ranking shows Dhoni at no.1 while KP at no.7 How did you prove it wrong? You have just helped me!I have, and you ignored it. "All the stats are in Pietersen's favour. His overall average is higher, his average against proper teams is better, his average with not outs taken off is higher, he's scored more hundreds in less games, Pietersen's record is better after 50 games a piece. The only thing Dhoni has on Pietersen is strike rate. Pietersen is far better"
As soon as you reply to that you'll get a useful reply.
Not going to reply to useless posts. If you prove my edivence wrong then i will reply otherwise i won't.Thanks for replying to my post on the end of page 8, Saurav...
the whole world acepts ICC rankings. It doesn't matter if you disagree with it or not. I don't have to prove it right because its by ICC. If they don't make correct lists of rankings then why do we have them? ICC ranking is not enought just to prove KP useless? Highlander already accepted he is useless. I got people turn on my side but no1 turned from Dhoni to KP. Also, "a batter getting out to useless bowler is quite useless". Its not said by me but KP himself so he thinks he is a useless batter.Unless you prove why the logic used by the ICC rankings is greater than that provided by King Pietersen, your argument falls flat.
Highlander already accepted he is useless.
lol don't bother King Cricket. Seriously. I've had enough of trying to convince people that Sehwag isn't a lucky home slogger, Hayden isn't a rubbish test openner because he played for Australia and now this.
^^ I quite agree that KP is a better batsman. Dhoni is a better over-all player. Good keeper, very good batsman and so far good captaincy.
I can't reply to you because i have no idea what your point is. Type in english will you? clearly state your point and watch my comment on it. Also, don't be ignorant just ebcause your national teams: Australia and Pakistan are worthless. Especially Pakistan, worst team ever.
PIETERSEN IS A NUMBER 4 NOT A NUMBER 3.
Pretty sure I've said that at least 3 times in this thread to you. The number 6-7 has an advantage statistically though, as Dhoni's average is massively inflated due to a series of not out scores, hence Pietersen's average at #5.
OMG, you make me want to rip my hair out! How can anyone be so stupid!? You are clearly the Indian equivalent of Aussie_Ben now. The national team thing is a joke. Can you get that through your thick little head? My english is far, far superior to your trash talk (biggest understatement in the history of mankind). You are so blind it is not even funny. My english is fine, you just don't have any way in which to reply to that post.
No, that is Precambrian.You are clearly the Indian equivalent of Aussie_Ben now.
How can anyone be so stupid!?
No, that is Precambrian.
Guys, chill out everyone. Its obvious KP is a better player, you cannot compare the two of them. The only thing that Dhoni is better at is captaincy/keeping. Dhoni is a great player, but anyone who thinks he is a better batsmen than KP knows nothing about cricket.
Guys, chill out everyone. Its obvious KP is a better player, you cannot compare the two of them. The only thing that Dhoni is better at is captaincy/keeping. Dhoni is a great player, but anyone who thinks he is a better batsmen than KP knows nothing about cricket.
you cannot compare the two of them.
but anyone who thinks he is a better batsmen than KP knows nothing about cricket.