Yeah, England did the hard work and Strauss didn't make most of it.
I'd say it is about even, 2-3 early wickets and 150/4 or 150/5 won't look so clever. We won't know if it will get any easier to bat for a while. This could be far more interesting than the kind of flat tracks you too often get, batsmen having to earn their runs and bowlers and fielders having to make most of the conditions and take catches. What could England have been but for dropped catches?
No surprise Khan bowled well and did the damage, how long was he at Worcs? He's their best bowler by far, in this country (type conditions) certainly. I just hope our bowlers fire, the decision to have Broad in the side will be seriously tested if we score say 225-275 and need to pick up regular wickets. I hope he's not "told" to bang it in short and waste the ball and conditions, I remember India I think it must have been 2002 where we were bowling and they were 30 odd for 1 and the ball was doing a bit. Then England went mad on the short stuff and that was it, India put on 600+
3rd Test: England v India at Leeds, Aug 22-26, 2002 | Cricket Scorecard | ESPN Cricinfo
I think it was that one, fits the bill even if the cricinfo commentary is rather 'basic'. Conditions favouring the bowler need to be made most of, the side that does that well and whose batsmen don't throw their wickets away win the match rather than the side who gets best of the conditions/bats first