It's all well and good saying "trust England to call someone in who hasn't got ODI experience", but what seamer other than Woakes could you call up? I'm surprised they didn't go for Woakes. But you aren't going to go for Plunkett are you? He's a bit, er, crap.
I'm not even sure I'd have brought in a seamer, we already have Bresnan (or do we?), Anderson, Tremlett and I guess Collingwood/Wright/Bopara. Of course with Anderson misfiring I suppose you could call up a seamer, but there's plenty with more than NO experience - Mahmood, Kabir Ali, Plunkett as you mentioned, Harmison, Finn, Sidebottom (retired as he might be), Woakes as you mention, Onions (if fit) and Mascarenhas (if fit) to name a few.
I seriously question whether England forward plan at all, not giving Tredwell more ODIs before selecting him and predictably not using him until the last, picking Yardy and Wright consistently while they've shown little or no improvement/promise and taken up other candidates spaces in the team.
Biggest problem is what I'll mention next :
There aren't back-ups in the county circuit with significant international experience.
Well that is a self-imposed stupidity on the part of the selectors, picking Test bowlers for ODIs and bowling them into the ground and then complaining they are exhausted by a hectic schedule
Sure you need to pick your better players, but could they not play say Trott and Strauss one ODI series, then Bell and KP the next kind of thing? It wasn't a secret where the World Cup was being held, yet how often did England give other spinners a chance and take a chance to rest Swann?
I didn't specify "significant" international experience, and part of my point is England's rather random approach to selection. Surely they don't just stick their thumbs up their Rses and pull them out and pick whoever looks most like what has come out on the end of their thumb?!?!?! Surely they discuss potentials to keep an eye on, a shortlist of candidates to come in when injuries occur or simply for progression when a player is found wanting!?!?!
What I mean is they pick one player for a few ODIs one series, then someone else for a few the next, then another, then another, and the whole process seems entirely uncoordinated and lacking planning. It happens in Tests AND ODIs, it's why players get one or two caps then disappear like Khan and Pattinson.
----------
Don't be so bloody thick! Why would anyone be happy someone has to stop their job because they have depression? He might have copped a bit of flack but no one wishes him physical/mental problems......we aren't Indian fans!
I don't think he is suggesting someone should be happy he is depressed, but that a player who is not performing (and is very lucky to be in that job in the first place, but that's an aside), is being replaced by someone who could be useful.
Or are you telling me if an underperforming member of the squad is injured and replaced you aren't happy?!?!?! So why should this be any different?
What's Yardy got to be depressed about? He's lucky he was in the squad and playing for England at all, most people would swap places with him, Trescothick and the rest at a heartbeat rather than scrape a living. Sportsmen being depressed just makes me angry, they should consider what their life might be like.
And if he's depressed perhaps someone should tell him my dad, and plenty of others worldwide have cancer, are dying, people have died in conflicts, disasters, tragedies, people get abused etc, and then maybe he'd get a bit of PERSPECTIVE. But then sportsmen don't live in the real world, so excuse me if I don't bend over backwards to feel sympathy.