FTP: From the Pavilion general chat
- Thread starter voldemort
- Start date
Another commanding display in the shorter version .
From the Pavilion - Free Online Cricket Management Game
From the Pavilion - Free Online Cricket Management Game
AkshayS
Chairman of Selectors
From the Pavilion - Free Online Cricket Management Game
fearsome tweak, a tie, we could've won it but meh...........................
My batting was certainly capable of chasing that.
fearsome tweak, a tie, we could've won it but meh...........................
My batting was certainly capable of chasing that.
Chewie
BCCI President
My match was pretty close but a few players won it for me in the end - the two Tim Lindemans, van Huffesteijn and my wicket-keeper Stanford.
They were cruising along at 90-1 but then they continually lost wickets, ending up all out for 162. Lindemand and van Huffesteijn both took four wickets.
Battingwise we were doing alright and then this happened:
9.3 W Sternberg to Wijma : Slightly short and coming in with the angle, too good a delivery for Wijma, who fails to get bat on ball and is caught plumb in front of the stumps.
S. Wijma lbw b. J. Sternberg 23 (29b 2x4 0x6) SR:79.31
9.4 W Sternberg to Arnold : Fuller length delivery outside the off stump. Arnold drives away from his body with no real foot-work. It looked like the bat hit the ground - hard to say if there was an edge involved.
E. Arnold c B. Moore b. J. Sternberg 0 (1b 0x4 0x6) SR:0.00
9.5 . Sternberg to Lotz : In the zone outside off stump, Lotz lets that one go through to Moore.
9.6 W Sternberg to Lotz : Wait is the call, Baker misfields and the batters take off. Lotz is well short of his ground and is run out. The lesson here ladies and gents, is never run on a misfield.
J. Lotz run out (M. Baker) 0 (2b 0x4 0x6) SR:0.00
Which was pretty annoying and left Lindeman and Stanford at the crease, basically the last batsmen left. These two however were great and navigated the sticky pitch well to both score half centuries and get us home by 6 wickets with 4 overs remaining.
They were cruising along at 90-1 but then they continually lost wickets, ending up all out for 162. Lindemand and van Huffesteijn both took four wickets.
Battingwise we were doing alright and then this happened:
9.3 W Sternberg to Wijma : Slightly short and coming in with the angle, too good a delivery for Wijma, who fails to get bat on ball and is caught plumb in front of the stumps.
S. Wijma lbw b. J. Sternberg 23 (29b 2x4 0x6) SR:79.31
9.4 W Sternberg to Arnold : Fuller length delivery outside the off stump. Arnold drives away from his body with no real foot-work. It looked like the bat hit the ground - hard to say if there was an edge involved.
E. Arnold c B. Moore b. J. Sternberg 0 (1b 0x4 0x6) SR:0.00
9.5 . Sternberg to Lotz : In the zone outside off stump, Lotz lets that one go through to Moore.
9.6 W Sternberg to Lotz : Wait is the call, Baker misfields and the batters take off. Lotz is well short of his ground and is run out. The lesson here ladies and gents, is never run on a misfield.
J. Lotz run out (M. Baker) 0 (2b 0x4 0x6) SR:0.00
Which was pretty annoying and left Lindeman and Stanford at the crease, basically the last batsmen left. These two however were great and navigated the sticky pitch well to both score half centuries and get us home by 6 wickets with 4 overs remaining.
AkshayS
Chairman of Selectors
Bowled them our for 114 on a flat track, will be one of those easiest wins.
hedger_14
ICC Chairman
Young and Mol, you absolute legends. 150 run unbeaten partnership to win the must win game for us. Healy starred with 3/38, although at 4/26 and 5/98, we should have restricted them to less than the 214/7 which they got.
We fell behind though to be 60/3 and in a fair bit of trouble but Young and Mol were absolutely lethal with the bat, Young making 88* off 87 while Mol made 77* off 66 as we won by 7 wickets with just over 5 overs remaining.
We fell behind though to be 60/3 and in a fair bit of trouble but Young and Mol were absolutely lethal with the bat, Young making 88* off 87 while Mol made 77* off 66 as we won by 7 wickets with just over 5 overs remaining.
Papa_Smurf
International Cricketer
Quick question - is a player's rating related to how much training he's had?
Varun
ICC Board Member
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2009
- Location
- Delhi, India
- Online Cricket Games Owned
- Don Bradman Cricket 14 - Steam PC
Rating increases with the increase in attributes, and attributes can only be increased via training, so I think the answer should be yes.
hedger_14
ICC Chairman
haha, I was about to say, there's twice as many leagues in the Division lower.
----------
Well it's mainly his skills (which can be increased by training while exp can go up by playing matches) and his current form. Fatigue might be counted in that but I'm not sure.
----------
Well it's mainly his skills (which can be increased by training while exp can go up by playing matches) and his current form. Fatigue might be counted in that but I'm not sure.
hedger_14
ICC Chairman
Hmm, I thought form did affect player ratings. It might just be in Battrick then.
Similar threads
- Locked
