Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows

Which is your favourite book in the series?

  • The Philosopher's Stone

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • The Chamber of Secrets

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    17
blackleopard92 said:
actually HP shares too many powers with voldy.And this could only happen if HP is a horcrux.
There is one fact to support this.(which is thought of)
in the end of goblet of fire, voldy had total control over harry.However, then harry thinks of sirus, and love fills him.This love torments the piece of soul of voldy encased in HP's scar, and causes voldy immense pain.The pain is so great that he is forced to break the link between him and his soul encased in Harry.

What do u think?:)

I've heard it before, couldn't quite explain it though. I think Voldemort had control due to the Imperius curse. I think Harry will be forced to kill himself to leave Voldemort mortal. As "none can live while the other lives" or whatever the quote is, someone will be able to kill Voldemort once Harry is dead. Maybe.
 
A_whitey said:
I've heard it before, couldn't quite explain it though. I think Voldemort had control due to the Imperius curse. I think Harry will be forced to kill himself to leave Voldemort mortal. As "none can live while the other lives" or whatever the quote is, someone will be able to kill Voldemort once Harry is dead. Maybe.
Grammatically, "none can live while the other lives" would suggest that both cannot exist simultenously , rather than if one dies, the other will too, which is what you seem to be suggesting.

The harry as horcrux is a pretty interesting theory, what if Voldemort accidently made Harry a horcrux when he tried to kill him as a baby, and conseuqently transferred his powers on to him. This would explain their mysterious "connection".
 
blackleopard92 said:
actually HP shares too many powers with voldy.And this could only happen if HP is a horcrux.
There is one fact to support this.(which is thought of)
in the end of goblet of fire, voldy had total control over harry.However, then harry thinks of sirus, and love fills him.This love torments the piece of soul of voldy encased in HP's scar, and causes voldy immense pain.The pain is so great that he is forced to break the link between him and his soul encased in Harry.

What do u think?:)
Not very much.He was actually in Harry so thats why he felt such tremendous pain.
 
sachin said:
Not very much.He was actually in Harry so thats why he felt such tremendous pain.
actually, u can't enter another body without having any sort of presence there.

This was the reason how Dumbledore explained the extraordinary obedient nature of vodly's snake.he reasoned that it would be a horcrux, because of the snakes nature.
 
sachin said:
He can possess people or animals.He doesn't need them to be holding a horcux.Think of Quirrell.
he could posses quirrel because he himself entered into him.
The 7th part of soul entered quirrel
 
blackleopard92 said:
he could posses quirrel because he himself entered into him.
The 7th part of soul entered quirrel
Well then what exactly are you saying?Because Voldie can enter pretty much anyone.He doesn't need some special token! :)

bakshikshitiz said:
so what do we conclude how may horcruxes have been destryoyed till now?

The Diary of tom riddle
Quirrel
The Ring.Four to go-
The Locket
The Cup
Something of Ravenclaw or Gryffindor
And the Snake.
 
sachin said:
Well then what exactly are you saying?Because Voldie can enter pretty much anyone.He doesn't need some special token! :)
he could enter quirrel because he was in physcial contact with him, and overcame his soul.
However, with harry, it was different.Voldy was far away from Harry.he could control harry from such a long distance because he had a part of his soul already inside Harry.
Remember Harry saying he could feel whether voldy was happy, or sad or feeling different moods.I think this can only happens because Harry was a horcrux.
Also, I think harry had become a Horcrux accidently.
 
Well that was because he had a connection with his thoughts that Voldemort had imported to him.And that would mean Voldie would have to be a Horcrux as a Horcrux is a very complicated spell,and he would not have had time to perform it.Harry is a not a Horcrux and i really think it would be the most catastrophic thing JK could ever do.That would of course mean he'd have to die.
 
sachin said:
Well that was because he had a connection with his thoughts that Voldemort had imported to him.And that would mean Voldie would have to be a Horcrux
what does that mean?Voldy as a horcrux?

sachin said:
Harry is a not a Horcrux and i really think it would be the most catastrophic thing JK could ever do.That would of course mean he'd have to die.
Actually, there is a rumor that JKR hinted in her interview that HArry would die.

It was repoted in national daily
 
blackleopard92 said:
Actually, there is a rumor that JKR hinted in her interview that HArry would die.

It was repoted in national daily

Only thing Rowling said was that "don't always expect the hero to survive" or something along those lines. There is talk that she doesn't want someone else continuing the HP series after her death, and is therefore planning to kill off the main character, but that is only talk which is contradicted by the fact that she had said in 2004 that she was thinking of an eighth book. So if Harry does have to die, he'll die in the eighth book if there is one.
 
blackleopard92 said:
what does that mean?Voldy as a horcrux?


Actually, there is a rumor that JKR hinted in her interview that HArry would die.

It was repoted in national daily
Christ!You frustrate me!You say that because Harry has some Powers that Voldy has(he can see through voldies eyes),Harry must have been made a Horcrux!This is rubbish.As there was not enough time.I've WATCHED the interview.What she says is that she would ONLY kill him in the very last chapter,and DID NOT hint that she would.She does say that two other character die,and another recieved a reprieve.

Ritwik said:
Only thing Rowling said was that "don't always expect the hero to survive" or something along those lines. There is talk that she doesn't want someone else continuing the HP series after her death, and is therefore planning to kill off the main character, but that is only talk which is contradicted by the fact that she had said in 2004 that she was thinking of an eighth book. So if Harry does have to die, he'll die in the eighth book if there is one.
She said that she is NOT going to do an eighth book,maybe a book with background,but not an eighth.She says that The creator of Sherlok Hilmes did that(killed of his character),because he didn't want another author writing about him.She never hinted at doing so.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top