ICC Cricket World Cup - May/July 2019

Who will be crowned the ODI World Champion?


  • Total voters
    50
  • Poll closed .
And yeah the teams in the past actually comprehensively beat their opposition in the Final. Be it the great West Indies team of the 70's, Australian team of late 90s & 2000s, Pakistan rising from the Ashes in 1992, India breaking the jinx of not winning the WC for 28 years or upset by India and Sri Lanka in 1983 & 1996 Finals respectively. Also I've got no problem in saying that England are the World Champions and they deserve it after their hardwork in last 4 years but rating this victory along with the victory of other World Champions doesn't seem to be right. To conclude to that England going on to win the WC after being knocked out by Bangladesh in 2015 WC is one of the greatest comebacks in the history of the game.
 
I think I might be criticized for it, but despite having their best team in their history England still cannot go on to win the WC final. Yeah the result did go their way but they didn't go on to win the Final. I think England should consider themselves lucky to have got away at the end not to lose the match. The credit also should go to the Kiwis for actually defending a total that England on most of the occasions chase it down in 42-43 overs. I think New Zealand did way better than what they were expecting to do. If we consider the Semi-final match against India and the Final New Zealand probably emerged as victorious for the tournament. Sorry to say but it was actually England's loss of not being able to win the Final. England probably had a very good tournament and finally they broke the jinx of not being able to win the WC so, well done Boys !!!! But did England deserve to get as much credit as previous World Champions did ? I leave it to you guys.
What the absolute f*ck? Absolutely ludicrous statement.
 
What the absolute f*ck? Absolutely ludicrous statement.

I don't know why English fans are reacting so much. Everyone can have their opinions so as did I. And that abuse shows what manners do you have ! Don't know whether you've got enough maturity to be on this board or not.
 
And yeah the teams in the past actually comprehensively beat their opposition in the Final. Be it the great West Indies team of the 70's, Australian team of late 90s & 2000s, Pakistan rising from the Ashes in 1992, India breaking the jinx of not winning the WC for 28 years or upset by India and Sri Lanka in 1983 & 1996 Finals respectively. Also I've got no problem in saying that England are the World Champions and they deserve it after their hardwork in last 4 years but rating this victory along with the victory of other World Champions doesn't seem to be right. To conclude to that England going on to win the WC after being knocked out by Bangladesh in 2015 WC is one of the greatest comebacks in the history of the game.
Personally, I felt sharing the trophy, after a tie after 50 overs and super over, would have been a just way for it to end. I think every other World Cup until this one sharing the trophy would have happened after 50 overs. But under the rules England won. It doesn't mean the rules in place are good or the right rules but everyone knew them before the start of the game and the start of the super over.
 
I don't know why English fans are reacting so much. Everyone can have their opinions so as did I. And that abuse shows what manners do you have ! Don't know whether you've got enough maturity to be on this board or not.
Abuse!!! :lol:lol. So saying your post is ludicrous is abuse is it? Fook me. Surely a mature adult wouldn’t scream abuse at such a soft comment like man. I think I’ve come to the wrong place haha.
 
I don't know why English fans are reacting so much. Everyone can have their opinions so as did I. And that abuse shows what manners do you have ! Don't know whether you've got enough maturity to be on this board or not.


Well you did say you might be criticized for it. Look there is no doubt that England rode there luck. But they won. Whether it is a tie or not or whatever they won according to the rules everyone agreed to going into the tournament.

Yes it would have been nice if we had won with 120 balls to spare with Jason Roy on an amazing 153 not out off 72 balls. But we didn't. The greatest cricket game that has ever been played took place yesterday. Every single ingredient necessary to make that the greatest cricket game ever was present.

Skill, luck, misfortune, mistakes, close-calls....every element was present for that to happen. I can seriously and honestly say that if NZ had won I wouldn't have begrudged them it one bit even if they rode their luck just as much as England did. And they did ride their luck too in their own way.

To say after one day that England might be getting too much credit for winning the darn thing compared to other winners is for me just a nonsensical statement and indeed not a valid point of discussion.

If people were saying England is the greatest winner of the World Cup ever, I would understand it. But they are not: they are saying England scraped home by the skin of their testicles after the greatest rollercoaster ever, against an opponent who had just as much stake to lifting the trophy as they did.

The raw emotion, the joy, the heartbreak, the absolute madness of what happened needs to be the joyous core of what we take from this game and what all cricket fans, sports fans, fans of human endeavor should be talking about.

Cricket won, human beings and their compassion and care and genius won.....and England after all the dust settled lifted the trophy, as a small part of that whole drama. Amen.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Simon Taufel is Australian so he’s probably just bitter that England won. Nothing to see there.

Yes we have a diverse team, not sure if you’re using that to make a dig at the English team or not? Jason roy moved to England when he was and 10 and Ben Stokes when he was 12. Ben Stokes learned the game in Northern England. No problem with it...
Yes, then Dharmesana, Erasmus, Tucker, Aleem Dar were all from England right? Can't you see that Ben stokes didn't complete the run and the ball hit the bat before the completion of the run. If you dont know let me tell you that when its a four or a six, batsmen running between the wickets dont count as runs (only the four or six does). Pretty shameful that you're saying that an experienced umpire is biased. You won the world cup, Congrats.
 
Yes, then Dharmesana, Erasmus, Tucker, Aleem Dar were all from England right? Can't you see that Ben stokes didn't complete the run and the ball hit the bat before the completion of the run. If you dont know let me tell you that when its a four or a six, batsmen running between the wickets dont count as runs (only the four or six does). Pretty shameful that you're saying that an experienced umpire is biased. You won the world cup, Congrats.
I was sort of joking with the bitter Australian comment, so let’s leave it at that. It possibly should’ve been 5 runs. But who knows maybe Rashid could’ve done it, or hit a different shot to win the game. Or we could’ve easily lost. All what ifs.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top