Calling Pathan better than Akhtar is utter rubbish.Its just like saying "Mohammad Sami is a better bowler than Malcom Marshall".He may've been more useful than Akhtar in this match but not when u consider their whole careers.Shoiab ???????? For me Pathan already is more useful han Akhtar or Malik (whoever u mentioned).
Not impressed by his bowling ?????? You would have missed the first session of the 3 rd match.
Comparing Pathan with Wasim/Waqar/Imran/Sarfaraz is just like comparing Sami/Asif/Zaheer with McGrath/Lillee/Hadlee.Pathan is a fine bowler but how the hell is he better than Wasim/Waqar/Imran/Sarfaraz?"He can be " sounds as if those guys are nothing.Well good knowledge has to be said about those players.
Being better in one or two series doesn't mean that he is overall better than Akhtar.aditya123 said:Irfan was more useful than Akthar even in the 2004 India-Pakistan series .
If u want to consider the rankings only,then Akhtar's ranking as a bowler is much better than that of Pathan,both in ODIs & Tests & Akhtar didn't improve his ranking by taking loads of wickets against Bangladesh & Zimbabwe but Pathan did.So,where things stand now,Pathan can'tbe compared with a world class bowler like Akhtar.Compare Pathan with Akhtar when he shows the similar kind of performances against Australia & England also & maintains average & S/R better than Akhtar for sometime.Waiting for the new ICC rankings to see if they classify Irfan as an allrounder
Dhoni said:This match is going to be a draw. Now India won't be looking to win this one...too many runs...can't chase it.
Dhoni said:This match is going to be a draw. Now India won't be looking to win this one...too many runs...can't chase it.
aditya123 said:Irfan was more useful than Akthar even in the 2004 India-Pakistan series .
aditya123 said:Game Set and Match Pakistan .
We don`t deserve to win after letting a team set 245 runs after being 39/6 .
.