aussie_ben91
School Cricketer
I wouldn't take Anderson over Sidebottom. All of Anderson's success came against New Zealand and he didn't exactly set the world alight against South Africa.He hasn't though really. He prevailed against New Zealand and West Indies, the 2 weakest sides in Test cricket after Bangladesh. Then against decent sides his record is as follows:
South Africa:
2 Tests, 6 Wickets for 194 runs at 32.33
India:
3 Tests, 8/303 at 37.87.
Sri Lanka:
3 Tests, 5/318 at 63.60.
Hardly impressive figures. He was massively down on pace and swing against South Africa, and just didn't look dangerous. He needs to get back to 100% fitness if he's going to stand any chance of getting in the side. In terms of swing bowling, I'd take Jimmy Anderson over Sidey any day of the week. In English conditions Anderson will be incredibly dangerous against any side, except at Lords, which is ridiculously flat atm. Anderson has more pace and swings the ball both ways with very little change in his action, he's a far more dangerous bowler than Sidebottom.
Broad's got potential as well, I'd take Sidey over him at full fitness, but atm, Broad's a far better prospect and is offering far more to the team. Kabir Ali should have been Sidey's replacement in the squad, but he obviously doesn't exist according to the selectors.
Sidebottom's averages against India and Sri Lanka rised severely following several catches being dropped which should've been taken whilst I remember Anderson bowling 30 overs against India and going for almost 200 runs in an innings.