Mitchell Johnson or James Anderson?

Who is a better bowler now?


  • Total voters
    90

Brady

School Cricketer
Joined
Mar 18, 2008
Online Cricket Games Owned
Jimmy is turning into a world class bowler!

In england he is lethal! Mitchell isn't on teh same level IMO!
 

evertonfan

Chairman of Selectors
Joined
Aug 19, 2005
Location
Leeds, UK
Online Cricket Games Owned
Anderson isn't a complete muppet with the bat. As for your comment about fielding, well that just boggles the mind. Anderson's fielding is world class.
 

manee

Chairman of Selectors
Joined
Jul 1, 2005
Location
England
Online Cricket Games Owned
Yes, no fast bowler in world cricket history is/was a 'far better' fielder than Anderson.
 

Themer

Chairman of Selectors
Joined
Sep 23, 2005
Location
Newark, UK
Online Cricket Games Owned
Currently with Collingwood out of the team he has proven he is probably Englands best outfielder and is probably one of the best fielders who are bowlers.
 
D

Deleted member 13648

Guest
Putting hair aside for the moment, Anderson is still the better bowler. He's matured brilliantly over the last few months and he generates masses amount of swing. Bowlers, try his action. I guarantee you'll get more wickets. It's been working for me.
 

manee

Chairman of Selectors
Joined
Jul 1, 2005
Location
England
Online Cricket Games Owned
I've tried it too, itbt. The keys to Anderson's action, it must be noted, are the very long, high jump, dead straight front leg and full shoulder rotation.
 

Powderwombat

School Cricketer
Joined
Jul 24, 2008
Online Cricket Games Owned
Johnson.

The only time Anderson has impressed me is when he's bowling outswing, IMO he's not International standard if he's not swinging the ball.

Johnson is better with the old ball, can swing the new one, and is faster.
 

Themer

Chairman of Selectors
Joined
Sep 23, 2005
Location
Newark, UK
Online Cricket Games Owned
Johnson.

The only time Anderson has impressed me is when he's bowling outswing, IMO he's not International standard if he's not swinging the ball.

Johnson is better with the old ball, can swing the new one, and is faster.

Did you not see Anderson in Englands last test match he bowled superbly with a ball which failed to swing hardly at all.
 

usy

Chairman of Selectors
Joined
May 2, 2005
Online Cricket Games Owned
Sohail Tanvir is better then both of em', thend of this story.
 

Themer

Chairman of Selectors
Joined
Sep 23, 2005
Location
Newark, UK
Online Cricket Games Owned
Seeming as thought he isn't in the poll thats as relevent as the fact Im not wearing socks.
 
Last edited:

usy

Chairman of Selectors
Joined
May 2, 2005
Online Cricket Games Owned
I'm just saying that he is a better one day bowler then both of them.

Test: Anderson
ODI: Tanvir
T20: Tanvir

so you'd rather want a Sajid Mahmood V Johnson, thread.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top