Mitchell Johnson or James Anderson?

Who is a better bowler now?


  • Total voters
    90
Jimmy is turning into a world class bowler!

In england he is lethal! Mitchell isn't on teh same level IMO!
 
Anderson isn't a complete muppet with the bat. As for your comment about fielding, well that just boggles the mind. Anderson's fielding is world class.
 
Yes, no fast bowler in world cricket history is/was a 'far better' fielder than Anderson.
 
Currently with Collingwood out of the team he has proven he is probably Englands best outfielder and is probably one of the best fielders who are bowlers.
 
Putting hair aside for the moment, Anderson is still the better bowler. He's matured brilliantly over the last few months and he generates masses amount of swing. Bowlers, try his action. I guarantee you'll get more wickets. It's been working for me.
 
I've tried it too, itbt. The keys to Anderson's action, it must be noted, are the very long, high jump, dead straight front leg and full shoulder rotation.
 
Johnson.

The only time Anderson has impressed me is when he's bowling outswing, IMO he's not International standard if he's not swinging the ball.

Johnson is better with the old ball, can swing the new one, and is faster.
 
Johnson.

The only time Anderson has impressed me is when he's bowling outswing, IMO he's not International standard if he's not swinging the ball.

Johnson is better with the old ball, can swing the new one, and is faster.

Did you not see Anderson in Englands last test match he bowled superbly with a ball which failed to swing hardly at all.
 
Sohail Tanvir is better then both of em', thend of this story.
 
Seeming as thought he isn't in the poll thats as relevent as the fact Im not wearing socks.
 
Last edited:
I'm just saying that he is a better one day bowler then both of them.

Test: Anderson
ODI: Tanvir
T20: Tanvir

so you'd rather want a Sajid Mahmood V Johnson, thread.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top