Next three IPL seasons to comprise 74 matches each

So Was It A Right Decision?


  • Total voters
    13

ShamiLoverGlipGlops

The Man With The Glip Glops
India
NZ....
AFG...
KKR
Avengers
Joined
Aug 14, 2008
Online Cricket Games Owned
  1. Don Bradman Cricket 14 - PS3
  2. Don Bradman Cricket 14 - Steam PC
  3. Don Bradman Cricket 14 - Xbox One
Two fundamental issues concerning the 2011 IPL season - the tournament format and player retention - have been finally resolved by the league's governing council, after months of uncertainty following the addition of two new franchises. The next three seasons of the IPL will have 74 matches each, the format designed to reward the most consistent teams during the league phase of the tournament. The 2011 season will begin five days after the World Cup, which ends on April 2.
The governing council also decided to allow franchises to retain four players in their squads, the rest going into the auction scheduled for November. The franchises' spending power for a squad of 30 players has been capped at $9 million.

Format
In each of the next three seasons, the IPL will comprise 70 league matches and four playoffs. The ten teams will be split into two groups of five each, but will be ranked together in one composite league table. The change was necessary due to the inclusion of two new teams, Pune and Kochi, from the next season. An extension of the current home-and-away format would have stretched the season to 94 matches, which had prompted concerns of player burn-out. Franchise owners were also reluctant to reduce the minimum number of matches their team would play each season. These constraints have led to a convoluted format.
League phase
Every team will play the same number of league games (14, seven home and seven away) as in previous seasons with the following break-up: each team will play the other four in its group both home and away (eight matches), four of the teams in the other group once (four matches, either home or away) and the remaining team in the other group twice, both home and away. A random draw will decide the composition of the groups as well as who plays whom across the groups once and twice.
Playoffs
The teams that finish first and second in the league table will contest the first playoff, which is effectively a semi-final (Game A). The teams that finish third and fourth will play each other in a knockout that is effectively a quarter-final (Game B). The loser of Game A will play the winner of Game B in a match (Game C) that will decide the second finalist that will play the winner of Game A in the grand final. This playoff format was previously used in New Zealand's domestic one-day tournament last season.

Player retention

Franchise salary cap reduction


  • $1.8 million per year for the first player retained
  • $1.3 million per year for the second player retained
  • $900,000 per year for the third player retained
  • $500,000 per year for the fourth player retained

Each of the eight franchises that participated in 2010 can retain up to four players but a maximum of only three Indians. The retained players must have been part of the franchise's registered squads for the 2010 season and will not be part of November's auction.
The franchise, and the player it wishes to retain must come to a mutual agreement regarding the retention and the fee for the 2011 and 2012 seasons. However, irrespective of the actual fee agreed upon by the franchise and the player, the franchise's salary cap will be reduced by fixed amounts.
If a franchise decides to retain four players, it will be charged $4.5 million per year and will have only $4.5 million to spend on other players, compared to the $9 million available to a franchise that retains no one. Also, the size of the squad is capped at 30 players.
Ahead of the auction in November, the two new franchises, Pune and Kochi, will also be allowed to sign up to four players from a list of players who were not part of any of the other eight franchises in the first three IPL seasons. However, if either Pune or Kochi sign players ahead of the auction, their salary cap will also be reduced by the same amount as the salary cap for existing franchises retaining players.
All the other international capped players, as well as other players who have played 75% of their side's IPL matches in 2010, will be part of the auction.

Player regulation


Non-international Indian cricketers' salaries


  • Rs 10,00,000 ($21,500) per year for players who have not played first-class or List A between 2009-10 and 2010-11 and for those who debuted in this period
  • Rs 20,00,000 ($43,000) per year for players who first played first-class or List A in the 2006-07, 2007-08 or 2008-09 seasons
  • Rupees 30,00,000 ($64,500) per year for players who first played first-class or List A in the 2005-06 season or earlier

A franchise can have up to ten overseas players in their squad but only four can be on the field during a game. The player contracts that will be signed ahead of the 2011 season will be valid for two years, with a right of extension for the third year.
All players who are part of a franchise's squad will come under the salary cap. The Indian cricketers who have not yet played an international game will have their salaries fixed as follows:

Player contracts
Another change is that the BCCI has decided to take more control of players IPL contracts, though a new policy has not yet been decided on. "All player contracts will now be managed by BCCI and signed by BCCI along with the franchise and the player," the board said. "No player contracts can be signed until [the new policy is in place]."

Revised catchment areas
The IPL has changed the catchment areas for the existing franchises because of the addition of two new teams from the 2011 season. Teams have to include four players from their catchment area in the squad of 30.


  • Mumbai Indians: Mumbai, Baroda
  • Royal Challengers Bangalore: Karnataka, Goa
  • Deccan Chargers: Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, Orissa
  • Chennai Super Kings: Tamil Nadu, Railways
  • Delhi Daredevils: Delhi, Uttar Pradesh, Uttaranchal
  • Kings XI Punjab: Punjab, Haryana, Himachal Pradesh, Jammu and Kashmir
  • Kolkata Knight Riders: West Bengal, Jharkhand, Assam, Tripura, Sikkim, Manipur
  • Rajasthan Royals: Rajasthan, Gujarat, Saurashtra
  • Pune Warriors: Maharashtra, Vidarbha
  • Kochi: Kerala, Services, Madhya Pradesh

http://www.cricinfo.com/indian-premier-league-2011/content/current/story/475828.html
 
Last edited:

Bounce

County Cricketer
Joined
May 31, 2010
Location
India
Online Cricket Games Owned
I did read the same article on Cricinfo just a few minutes back.
Dividing the teams into two groups is idiotic! :facepalm
 

Cricketman

ICC Chairman
Joined
Jul 27, 2005
Location
USA
CSK got screwed over by having Railways in our area. Not that many players from there, apart from maybe Murali Kartik.
 

riz7khan12

Panel of Selectors
Joined
Nov 30, 2009
Location
Auckland
Online Cricket Games Owned
Dividing the teams into two groups is idiotic!

what do you base this on, its a pretty good idea in my books. dividing them into groups like this where they play the other teams outside their group too is great.
 

SaiSrini

Respected Legend
CSK
PlanetCricket Award Winner
Joined
Apr 26, 2003
Location
USA
20 matches less than what was supposed to be. Its better. Still the players play the same amount of games that they played previously.

One good thing is that, this is coming after the World Cup. Which means India cant use IPL as an excuse if they fail in the WC.:laugh On Chennai, frankly we should be fine with Tamil Nadu and Railways catchment. Hope we find a decent fast bowler who can be a good asset. I guess Dhoni, Raina, Hayden and Bollinger/Vijay will be retained for Chennai (I dont think Murali is that imp in T20 to be retained, Bollinger is because he changed our fortunes last season).
 

Iridium

ICC Board Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2009
Location
Auckland
Profile Flag
New Zealand
Good decision IMO. 90+ games is just way too many. I'd even say that 70 odd matches is still too many but a definite improvement.
 

sifter132

Panel of Selectors
Joined
Oct 29, 2006
Location
NSW
^Indeed. 94 was going to be ridiculous. If I were running it, I'd play everyone once for 9 games plus an extra match against your nearest franchise (turn it into a rivalry) to give you 10 games, 5 home and 5 away. That would give you 50 matches plus 2 semis and a final. It just makes the games feel more special when there are less of them. And gives the players a bit more rest too.

I like the ideas on player retention, it will definitely make the franchises think about who to keep and it probably ensures that virtually all the internationals will be back up for auction apart from a few very special cases - like Gilchrist and Warne, maybe Symonds too I would guess. But I can't help thinking that it won't help the 2 new franchises at all, they get no compensation at all it seems.
 

SaiSrini

Respected Legend
CSK
PlanetCricket Award Winner
Joined
Apr 26, 2003
Location
USA
Who will Mumbai retain apart from Sachin (SACHIN IS GOING NOWHERE)? Harbhajan and Zaheer must be top of the list, but they have big names like Pollard and Malinga and they can retain only 4. This idea of retaining only 4 players makes it very interesting to see who retains who.
 

riz7khan12

Panel of Selectors
Joined
Nov 30, 2009
Location
Auckland
Online Cricket Games Owned
I dont think Rajasthan will be looking to retain anyone except warne, although warne is quite old...
 

Abhas

Retired Administrator
Joined
Aug 6, 2004
Location
New Delhi, India
It might make more sense in letting your players go, and try to win them back in auction at a cheaper price. If Rajasthan choose to retain Warne, they are effectively foregoing 1.8 mn, which they can use in the auction to get much better players. Probably Warne in the auction might go for something like 700K-1mn, that would still mean more finances available to purchase other good players.

Remember, each team has 9mn to spend for its players, and they would all be looking to get 5 good players than 1 awesome player and 4 below average.
 

riz7khan12

Panel of Selectors
Joined
Nov 30, 2009
Location
Auckland
Online Cricket Games Owned
It might make more sense in letting your players go, and try to win them back in auction at a cheaper price. If Rajasthan choose to retain Warne, they are effectively foregoing 1.8 mn, which they can use in the auction to get much better players. Probably Warne in the auction might go for something like 700K-1mn, that would still mean more finances available to purchase other good players.

Letting Warne go will be kinda like a insult to warne who has done so much for the team and franchise. But yeah i'm not sure if anyone will be interested in his services now really.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top