ODIs act as an all-rounder in the team. They are a combination of both tests and t20s and check the adaptability of a batsman or bowler
Worth noting that the same figure - national average audience - for the ODIs played in Australia shown on Channel Nine this year is 1.67 million viewers for the second session. The data isn't fully available for regional areas for all the first sessions, but for the two matches where it is, including the whole match makes the average 1.48 million.Boasting a national average audience of 1.1 million viewers on Network Ten, the BBL has soared above the Australian Football League and National Rugby League, who average 804,000 and 887,600 per match on free-to-air television respectively.
Relatively few people want to spend an entire day watching cricket, even fewer want to watch five full days.
Then why not keep 5 over matches. Why not keep the boundaries very short and no fielders because most of the public wants to see sixes and foursThe older formats simply can’t compete. Relatively few people want to spend an entire day watching cricket, even fewer want to watch five full days. Three hours of prime time evening entertainment on the other hand is what the sponsors want because it’s what the public wants.
No matter what, it's time to accept that T20 and ODI's(to some extent) are the real forms of the game and that Test cricket is simply old, boring, time and resource consuming. If we spend the funds towards shorter formats (specially t20 leagues) we can bring out so much talent from associate nations and soon be a lot like Football has become. Unfortunately CA and ECB want to still live in the Victorian Era. Clearly the numbers state otherwise.
Our discussion here was about ODI existence. Test cricket is the purest form and we all love to enjoy it.[DOUBLEPOST=1462895272][/DOUBLEPOST]The older formats simply can’t compete. Relatively few people want to spend an entire day watching cricket, even fewer want to watch five full days. Three hours of prime time evening entertainment on the other hand is what the sponsors want because it’s what the public wants.
Abolishing Test Matches would not hekp Associate Cricket in any way
we already have hong kong sixes tournament and its real boringThen why not keep 5 over matches. Why not keep the boundaries very short and no fielders because most of the public wants to see sixes and fours
No matter what, it's time to accept that T20 and ODI's(to some extent) are the real forms of the game and that Test cricket is simply old, boring, time and resource consuming. If we spend the funds towards shorter formats (specially t20 leagues) we can bring out so much talent from associate nations and soon be a lot like Football has become. Unfortunately CA and ECB want to still live in the Victorian Era. Clearly the numbers state otherwise.
Our discussion here was about ODI existence. Test cricket is the purest form and we all love to enjoy it.[DOUBLEPOST=1462895272][/DOUBLEPOST]
Agreed , but too much cricket in any format is real concern .
Utter sesame street......this is complete subjective nonsense...its like stating that breakfast is becoming old-fashioned...it just doesn't correlate with actual facts.....No matter what, it's time to accept that T20 and ODI's(to some extent) are the real forms of the game and that Test cricket is simply old, boring, time and resource consuming. If we spend the funds towards shorter formats (specially t20 leagues) we can bring out so much talent from associate nations and soon be a lot like Football has become. Unfortunately CA and ECB want to still live in the Victorian Era. Clearly the numbers state otherwise.
It is interesting that all those in favour have joined very very recently......just to check can some mod actually check if there is a correlation between the accounts of users calling t20 the real cricket! [HASHTAG]#justsaying[/HASHTAG]