???? he went for like 8aussie1st said:Symonds in now, good start so far. Looks like Cullen will have to bowl at least 7 overs with Clark going so crap.
Eh? Surely if he's in the team as a bowler, then he's there to bowl all 10 if needed?aussie1st said:Symonds in now, good start so far. Looks like Cullen will have to bowl at least 7 overs with Clark going so crap.
langerrox said:???? he went for like 8
MUFC1987 said:Eh? Surely if he's in the team as a bowler, then he's there to bowl all 10 if needed?
are u watching it live? If your just using cricinfo theres not much point posting about how someone is bowling as you can't see them or the actual score at the actual time of posting.aussie1st said:"Started" being the key word, I posted when he had 1 off 4 balls. Still better than Watson's start.
yeh bring on clarke, i love to watch some foffies before i go to bed!!wfdu_ben91 said:Gee wiz that Cullen has absolutely NO muscle on him.
Maybe they should bring Michael Clarke in, I mean afterall his one of the few bowlers who have a Test bowling average of under 10. His bowling average is good enough to be McGrath's batting average