jdbais
International Cricketer
shahid6995 said:By the way, I guess we now know what Tendulkar feels about "walking".
What happened?
shahid6995 said:By the way, I guess we now know what Tendulkar feels about "walking".
man frankly tell me which pakistani batsman would have walked when the umpire had emphatically turned down the appeal...though i liked the way the fielders responded to the denial...and i suppose Kaif made the philosophy of Indian team abt walking amply clear when he said that "I won't walk, the umpire's got a job to do."shahid6995 said:By the way, I guess we now know what Tendulkar feels about "walking".
Inzi had it all planned out and paid well in the end. Sachin out six short of a record 35th Test century.jdbais said:It has taken Inzi 40 overs to finally take the new ball. What was he thinking? It's not like they were doing well with the old one.
And what do you know. As soon as he takes the new ball he gets Tendulkar.
Sachin out six short of a record 35th Test century.
He inside edged the ball onto his pad and was caught off Kaneria for 4, the Umpire gave him not out. Tendulkar must have known he was out....Inzamam ran in all the way from short extra cover to celebrate!jdbais said:What happened?
By that standard, Azharuddin should never have been kicked out of the game.m_vaughan said:you need to know that some players are simply irreplaceable. :hpraise
no need to get touchy... but i guess we cant expect an unbiased opinion about tendulkar from someone called sachinisgod....sachinisgod said:man frankly tell me which pakistani batsman would have walked when the umpire had emphatically turned down the appeal...
sohummisra said:In my opinion today was a day of what-could-have-been for India. Sachin could have broken a record and India could have won the match. Not that they still can't, but such an opportunity may not come again in the near future. All India needed to do was maintain a normal test match run rate (over 3 an over)... that is normal for one of the proper-cricketing nations in the world. Normal for a team filled with 6 top-order stroke makers. Normal for a country with a history of high-scoring batsmen.
What did they do? Score 130 runs in just about 60 overs. What did they achieve? Spectator frustration. What did they lose? A chance to press home their advantage. With all due respect to Pakistan (and their bouncer strategy--great stuff), what were India thinking? Aaarghh.. I cannot write all this again. Check out hummercricket for more of my opinion. :P And some easy advertising too, eh?
I read your blog too, at least most of it... i think you are being silly and unnecessarily harsh on the indians... hey its just the end of the third day of a five day test.... maybe you are spoiled by australia but there used to be a time when test matches lasted well into the fifth day, and some even were equal after the fifth day! imagine that! it was called a "draw", if you must know...sohummisra said:In my opinion today was a day of what-could-have-been for India. Sachin could have broken a record and India could have won the match. Not that they still can't, but such an opportunity may not come again in the near future. All India needed to do was maintain a normal test match run rate (over 3 an over)... that is normal for one of the proper-cricketing nations in the world. Normal for a team filled with 6 top-order stroke makers. Normal for a country with a history of high-scoring batsmen.
What did they do? Score 130 runs in just about 60 overs. What did they achieve? Spectator frustration. What did they lose? A chance to press home their advantage. With all due respect to Pakistan (and their bouncer strategy--great stuff), what were India thinking? Aaarghh.. I cannot write all this again. Check out hummercricket for more of my opinion. :P And some easy advertising too, eh?