Pak_cricketer said:
But the slow attack doesn't always take wickets.. In south Africa Ntini and Nel show thta if you have pace it can be a helpful tool.
Actually the word `slow` used was a relative term.
I never advocated for a 120 kph attack.
The speed that the Indian bowlers bowl or the great Glen McGrath operates is good enough if they move the ball whereas if a bowler bowls at 150 kph without movement , it will not get top batsmen out regularly .
That is what is happening with Sami.
He is a skiddy bowler but he has to move the ball.
The last time I remember him looking lethal was against NZ in NZ and that is because the conditions also helped him to move the ball.
You may point out an odd instance of him getting a good batsman out with a ripper but that is not good enough at the test level as his record shows.
Look at a bowler from your own side in Md.Asif .
He is`nt what you call a tearaway quick , is he ?
But look at how successful he has been even at his pace.
The reason being his ability to move the ball of the deck.
On good slow batting tracks in the subcontinent, the quick bowlers come nicely onto the bat making it easy for the batsmen .
That is where a bowler who can extract movement will be useful.
Sami is just the type of bowler strokemakers like and hence him getting thrashed by the likes of Sehwag, Dhoni when India toured Pakistan in 2004 and 2006.
The same V.Sehwag was troubled quite a bit by Asif and Rana Naved.
I hope this explains my point.