When its two sided then its not a problem. I remember i used to play against Rehan and the ball lagged for both the players, so it balances out. But when it lags only on one side than it gives the other player some advantage.
Thats why i decided not to play against jara few days ago. But then i thought i have played many games against him and winning or losing isnt that important, enjoying the game is. But he took that as if was i chickening out becoz i was losing? And as if i have never won against his all pace attack?
Thats what infuriated me. Firstly i was playing with lag and on top of that against his 4 fast bowlers. Then he said you were losing against my 4 fast bowlers thats why you brought that 1 spinner rule. Can someone explain to me that when I said lets bring some spice into our games and make 2 overs of spin mandatory for each player, then was i asking him to bowl his quota of 2 overs of spin only? Wasnt i bowling 2 overs of spin also? So how is it suiting my ends only?
After every loss he started to blame the spinner, i used to ask him before every match whether you want to play with spinner or not? I wasnt forcing him. In some matches spinners didnt even do anything but still he blamed it on the spinners, i was like wtf? I decided to ask him to play with his pacers so that i can prove him wrong. There was a member here named vijayanand and we used to play with 4 overs of spin in T20. Did i know before asking jara to bring this 2 overs of spin rule, he suck at spin?
But I guess jara has a short memory can he please go back and read the previous pages. We used to play many T20's with fast bowlers only. And his scores batting first(90% of the time) were b/w 70-100. And i used to chase them easily. Even after we finished that spinner rule i won games against his all pace attack and in some of them i even bowled with spinners. I was trying to enjoy the game and taking it as a fun but guess what winning or losing is important for some players as if they will get prize money for that.