PCPL needs clarity(Officially Rigged)

PCPL needs clarity?


  • Total voters
    10
Status
Not open for further replies.
Btw future tip, people are allowed to respond to matts posts and even give differing opinions (gasp). He won't bite (unless you repeatedly thrash him online ) !!
I tried but got a warning no. 10 - You don't mess with the Boss.

And later a trophy - Daredevil 100 Points.
 
you even not thought about the possible ways to use the resource you already have... and you just reply it with one word... good going PCPL management...
Tbf Sportsbook is not for auctions. It is a betting add-on. How can someone organize auction in SB.
 
Tbf Sportsbook is not for auctions. It is a betting add-on. How can someone organize auction in SB.
He meant to say create a new event with the player name - teams will bid but without knowing other team bids, you've to predict and bid. The one with the highest bid gets the player. Could've worked too.
 
He meant to say create a new event with the player name - teams will bid but without knowing other team bids, you've to predict and bid. The one with the highest bid gets the player. Could've worked too.
Keeping the bids of other teams invisible is not possible in SB addon/plugin.
 
Keeping the bids of other teams invisible is not possible in SB addon/plugin.
I think we had that option earlier, surprised to know not available on Xenforo.


@User2010 Will a decision be taken on the questions this thread raised please? Team is still waiting.
 
I think we had that option earlier, surprised to know not available on Xenforo.


@User2010 Will a decision be taken on the questions this thread raised please? Team is still waiting.
Decision already taken. Announcement remaining. :spy
 
Tbf Sportsbook is not for auctions. It is a betting add-on. How can someone organize auction in SB.
  • create a new event under auctioning player... 'Pinch hitter'
  • create a odds under teams name... '6 odds = 6 teams'
  • only Team A owners allowed to place a wager on Team A odd... Rudi place a wager of 49,000 vcash on Team Saints odd to bid on player 'Pinch hitter'...
  • remove the limitation on placing wages... so team owners can bid as many times they wish...
  • owners can use the 'discussion' option to post there backout...
  • once 5 teams backout... use your power and name the highest staked odd (team) as a winning odd...
  • after do the reverse... take the vcash from the winners and transfer vcash back to the losing teams...
 
  • create a new event under auctioning player... 'Pinch hitter'
  • create a odds under teams name... '6 odds = 6 teams'
  • only Team A owners allowed to place a wager on Team A odd... Rudi place a wager of 49,000 vcash on Team Saints odd to bid on player 'Pinch hitter'...
  • remove the limitation on placing wages... so team owners can bid as many times they wish...
  • owners can use the 'discussion' option to post there backout...
  • once 5 teams backout... use your power and name the highest staked odd (team) as a winning odd...
  • after do the reverse... take the vcash from the winners and transfer vcash back to the losing teams...
It won't fasten the process I think :/
 
Guys I think we need to appreciate the efforts these guys put in, no use suggesting since auction is nearly over. Our only concern is the purple ratings for now rest everything has been fine since we are near the end now. Thanks!
 
  • create a new event under auctioning player... 'Pinch hitter'
  • create a odds under teams name... '6 odds = 6 teams'
  • only Team A owners allowed to place a wager on Team A odd... Rudi place a wager of 49,000 vcash on Team Saints odd to bid on player 'Pinch hitter'...
  • remove the limitation on placing wages... so team owners can bid as many times they wish...
  • owners can use the 'discussion' option to post there backout...
  • once 5 teams backout... use your power and name the highest staked odd (team) as a winning odd...
  • after do the reverse... take the vcash from the winners and transfer vcash back to the losing teams...

Nope the current method is better :)[DOUBLEPOST=1504967951][/DOUBLEPOST]
Umair Nazim

5 Season all 5 as Owners! and I upgraded my player not to mention I have been pretty active !
 
Nope the current method is better :)[DOUBLEPOST=1504967951][/DOUBLEPOST]

5 Season all 5 as Owners! and I upgraded my player not to mention I have been pretty active !
It's not about you or me, still waiting for an answer.
 
Villian and CK, let me ask you one thing first before posting anything else. Did you guys not know which PC player is in which pool before the auctions itself? I think so you knew it. If yes, then why did you guys not question the pools earlier? I have no role in deciding the player pools but this is the very basic question that comes to my mind right now.
 
Villian and CK, let me ask you one thing first before posting anything else. Did you guys not know which PC player is in which pool before the auctions itself? I think so you knew it. If yes, then why did you guys not question the pools earlier? I have no role in deciding the player pools but this is the very basic question that comes to my mind right now.
It came to our notice a few days back, team was formed on 23rd August. Our only and only point is isn't it unfair some already have 4 purple players who are rated purple based on nothing evident or strong while others are struggling to get even 1 from the auctions.

I even suggested them if they could turn all the owners to Blue or less which will make it a fair deal for everyone but thanks to Rudolph - FP left and now you guys are leaving for I don't know what.

We've posted a zillion times thanking the management for the work they've put into it but others jumped in questioning the auctions dragging us away from the topic which weren't a part of and I guess that might be the reason of your leaving.

Sorry for those frustrated messages or posts but you kept us in hope while still did not respond to the main issue.

We're okay backing out since we've hardly bought any while some from your team have worked hard on it.[DOUBLEPOST=1504974281][/DOUBLEPOST]Now if we can fix this issue and you guys return we'd be happy to return too. There was no need of the controversy or you guys leaving, people have invested hours into it who would not want to end it this abruptly.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Top