Pro35 Evolution : Cricket's Newest Format

[shravi]

"spin play" :laugh:rtfl

 

[Terminator]

No you don't. Unless we have International 35 over games you do not win.

If you find ODI long and boring then I hardly see how you can watch test cricket which can have most dull moments in a cricket game.

Crowds in West Indies have never been good for quite good time. Those crowds do not represent all cricket fans base. Australia stadiums are huge and do you expect full house for every game. Even T20 cannot guarantee that.

IPL is the worst form of cricket that exist and its just a fun time for 6 weeks in a year. Even players are in it for just making some quick bucks. Your IPL superstars have all been dud in International level. Shows you about the quality of game there.

It's hilarious to see you thinking you've 'won' :laugh This is one of the worst ideas in cricket ever.

And they wouldn't bat 8 hours for 150. You can't bat both innings :laugh

"spin play" :laugh:rtfl

This is my answer to you all :

Pro35 is needed bcoz:

1. Three formats is too much the audience can take.As a result they are getting divided(80% for T20,15% for ODIs,5% for Tests)
   
   
   
   [*]The domestic OD & FC tourneys do not get audience just because T20 is there & Pro40 is too long.
   
   
   
   [*]Spinplay will make the Pro35 matches more close within short duration.
   
   
   
   [*]It will help the associates & affiliates and thus globalize cricket.
   
   
   
   [*]Pro35 will bring together the OD & T20 crowd to the domestic competitions as a whole.
   
   
   
   [*]ODI is too long both for the viewers & for the players.
   
   
   
   [*]The team batting second are tired after fielding & bowling for 4 hours.Thus they are handicapped. (important point) reply this first
   

Pro35 can solve all this problems.

matt i am sorry for that it will be 150+ in 1 innings of 2 hrs in Pro35 & 3.5 hrs for 50 ovs.

Give points against all the above points then i will say i lose.

Pro35 is way better than two innings 25 overs ODIs.

What do you think ??

http://www.google.co.in/url?sa=t&so...g7TkDg&usg=AFQjCNHWJuVlJj0PkO3wIC2O8EXSpiRQRQ

http://www.cricinfo.com/magazine/content/story/463521.html

Answer this ??

 

[mattfb]

This is my answer to you all :

Pro35 is needed bcoz:

1. Three formats is too much the audience can take.As a result they are getting divided(80% for T20,15% for ODIs,5% for Tests)
   
   
   
   [*]The domestic OD & FC tourneys do not get audience just because T20 is there & Pro40 is too long.
   
   
   
   [*]Spinplay will make the matches more close within short duration.
   
   
   
   [*]It will help the associates & affiliates and thus globalize cricket.
   
   
   
   [*]Pro35 will bring together the OD & T20 crowd to the domestic competitions as a whole.
   
   
   
   [*]ODI is too long both for the viewers & for the players.
   
   
   
   [*]The team batting second are tired after fielding & bowling for 4 hours.Thus they are handicap also. (important point)
   

Pro35 can solve all this problems.

matt i am sorry for that it will be 150+ in 1 innings of 2 hrs in Pro35 & 3.5 hrs for 50 ovs.

Give points against all the above points then i will say i lose.

Pro35 is way better than two innings 25 overs ODIs.

What do you think ??

1. You pulled those figures out of thin air - that's bullshit.

2. Domestic cricket is very very popular. Everyone in Australia that actually likes cricket cares and follows their domestic team - I believe it's the same in England.

3. Already discussed spin play and told you why it's a horrid idea. You haven't come back with anything half decent to explain why it's good. You've tried to but it isn't appealing at all.

4. It won't help the associates anymore than T20. T20 helps them more than any other format and that's what is helping globalise cricket. In my opinion that is the only good thing about T20 cricket so I don't see the need to bring in another format to do that. We don't need to remove ODI cricket to globalise the sport.

5. You're naive if you think a mix between the two formats will instantly bring together both the crowds to fill out the stadium. In hindsight yes, that sounds very nice, but in reality it won't happen.

6. ODI is not too long It's rare to have a full 100 over game anyway. If you think ODI is too long then DON'T WATCH IT. It's simple. Farken.

7. That point is ridiculous. Look at England for example - they are specialise in batting second and chasing scores. Plus this is why top order batsmen field in close - so they don't need to run around chasing the ball all innings. Bowlers get a long rest before it's their turn to bat anyway so that's irrelevant.

Give up already.

 

[Cricketman]

Thread closed. I win.