It will make cricket more entertaining if 2 batsmen get centuries or a batman gets a 150+ score like 163* unlike 105 or 120 in T20s & a bowler gets 6-7 wickets.This will make the match statistics more substantial the word is subtance which T20 doesnt have at all.
What do you say to this??
T20 is too short for atleast 2 batsmen to get centuries (which has happened a lot of times in ODIs) or a batsman to score 150+ in an innings and too short for a bowler to take 6-7 wickets whereas it takes 7.5 hours for an ODI (50 ovs) to end too boring.
Pretty conclusive![]()
We have witnessed some close 50 over ODI matches in the last couple of days including Eng vs Ban match. 50 overs format is here to stay.
I agree T20 sucks. But batsmen score 150+ in ODI's and it's exciting.
Brendon McCullum... Too bad it was for some pathetic team in a pathetic tournament :doh
You are the ony one who seems to get bored watching odi cricket, you should just stick to the ipl with all the t20 fans who are to impatient to watch some real cricket.
Nobody agrees with this idea so you may aswell give up.
2 articles from 'experts' doesn't mate it true
And yes you can get 150+ in Pro35. I never said you couldn't. I just said it's possible in ODI which is yet another reason of why Pro35 is unnecessary.
You don't win. All you've done is fail. Hard.
There are 100 articles if you search the net and other forums.
150 in 4 hrs or 150 in 8 hrs which is less boring ?
I win again.
There are 100 articles if you search the net and other forums.
150 in 4 hrs or 150 in 8 hrs which is less boring ?
I win again.
There are 100 articles if you search the net and other forums.
150 in 4 hrs or 150 in 8 hrs which is less boring ?
I win again.
I win again.