helen_miene
School Cricketer
I think he did a great job to succeed.
It’s just the obsession Indians have with him is ridiculous, he’s not that good.
Steve Smith is better.
Virat Kohli said:"If I get in early at three, I have the option to analyse about the game what is going on and play my game accordingly. I want to execute my plans batting at No. 3. I feel confident that I can control the game better at No. 3."
Harsha Bhogle said:"Chase the better chaser than this young man !!!!"
Maybe try backing up your statement with facts?I don’t hate him, don’t know the guy. It’s just the obsession Indians have with him is ridiculous, he’s not that good.
Ok, here you go.Maybe try backing up your statement with facts?
Ok, here you go.
http://www.howstat.com/cricket/Statistics/Batting/BattingAverages.asp?Stat=1
Test average comes in at rank 23. You have Smith at number 2 only behind Bradman, and Williamson at 25.
So again, i stand by my statement. Kohli is good, but not that good. The obsession with him is strange.
Nobody disputes that Smith is better in Tests. Cherry picking stats like this just proves my point. Since you like averages, let's compare ODI ones, with a 20 innings cut-off (the table you posted has the same cut-off)Ok, here you go.
http://www.howstat.com/cricket/Statistics/Batting/BattingAverages.asp?Stat=1
Test average comes in at rank 23. You have Smith at number 2 only behind Bradman, and Williamson at 25.
So again, i stand by my statement. Kohli is good, but not that good. The obsession with him is strange.
Ok, here you go.
http://www.howstat.com/cricket/Statistics/Batting/BattingAverages.asp?Stat=1
Test average comes in at rank 23. You have Smith at number 2 only behind Bradman, and Williamson at 25.
So again, i stand by my statement. Kohli is good, but not that good. The obsession with him is strange.
Nobody disputes that Smith is better in Tests. Cherry picking stats like this just proves my point. Since you like averages, let's compare ODI ones, with a 20 innings cut-off (the table you posted has the same cut-off)
http://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/content/records/282911.html
Kohli is 2nd, Smith is 52nd.
Chasing is much harder in ODIs, so let's compare 2nd innings averages, with a 20 innings cut-off.
http://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/en...nnings;size=100;template=results;type=batting
Kohli is 1st, with an average of 68.50. Smith is 38th.
Now, i didn't compare Kohli with Smith, you did. I simply asked you to prove that Kohli "isn't that good". Those numbers i posted above are pretty impressive for someone who isn't that good, right?
My original point is not to compare him to anyone. And I never said he wasn’t good. Not really trying to compare him to others, link simply showed his average on the test arena.Wow. I think this is the best reason one can give. Come up with something better mate !
My original point is not to compare him to anyone. And I never said he wasn’t good. Not really trying to compare him to others, link simply showed his average on the test arena.
See this is the problem. So many people, mainly Indians, are OBSESSED with Kohli.
He is elevated to this level of ‘god like’ ability.
My point still stands though (even though a few people just got triggered)
He is good, but not that good.
If he was the greatest thing since sliced bread he would be clear #1, or close to it l, in all categories and wouldn’t choke in major tournaments
Nobody considers him "God-like", mate, at least on these forums. It may seem like that to you because people in the subcontinent are extremely passionate about cricket, and i admit there are plenty of irrational fans, but i haven't seen any on this site. Everyone knows he has limits.My original point is not to compare him to anyone. And I never said he wasn’t good. Not really trying to compare him to others, link simply showed his average on the test arena.
See this is the problem. So many people, mainly Indians, are OBSESSED with Kohli.
He is elevated to this level of ‘god like’ ability.
My point still stands though (even though a few people just got triggered)
He is good, but not that good.
If he was the greatest thing since sliced bread he would be clear #1, or close to it l, in all categories and wouldn’t choke in major tournaments
Virat Kohli said:I had put too much pressure on myself before going to England that I needed to score here. I don't know why sub-continent players are given different benchmarks that we have to perform in certain countries and if you don't do that, you are not considered a good player.
I think it was more about me being desperate to do well in England and then when you don't do well at the start, you start going down mentally.
Technique is important, but even people with not that strong technique have been able to score well there because of a good mindset. The problem with me was that I was expecting in-swingers too much and opened up my hip a lot more than I should have done. I was constantly looking for the in-swinger and was in no position to counter the out-swing.
I used to stand at two-leg (middle stump) and my stance was pretty closed. Then I figured out that after initial movement my toe wasn't going towards point. Rather, it was towards cover-point, so anyway my hip was opening up initially. So to get the feel of the ball, I had to open up my hip as I was too side-on. Anyway, I had too much of a bottom-hand grip and I didn't have too much room for my shoulder, to adjust to the line of the ball, so it was getting too late when it swung in front of my eyes.