AngryPixel
Chairman of Selectors
- Joined
- Jul 28, 2009
- Location
- Mumbai, India
- Online Cricket Games Owned
- Don Bradman Cricket 14 - PS3
- Don Bradman Cricket 14 - Steam PC
The thing with Watson is he never goes super crazy, usually he tries to stay technically correct and leaves the good balls and waits for the bad ones. It isn't very often you see his strike rate that much above 100. Add that to his problem with converting his 50s into 100s and you would have to see a lot go right for Watson to do it. That is why the Bangladesh series came out of the blue for me, he never really looked like threatening the 200 mark until that game.
Seriously you can never predict anything in cricket. Everyone tends to believe that you need to go super crazy for a double ton in ODI but Tendulkar proved everyone wrong that day. It was just top class cricket with a little bit of imagination on Tendulkar's part(loved the way he walked across the stumps and whipped Steyn for 4 around 34th over).
Both 200's came on pretty flat deck with shorter boundaries. Thus only way to compare two is by comparing the bowling attacks they faced. So IMO a bowling attack of Langevelt,Parnel,Kallis and Steyn is far better than Roach,Narine,Ramoaul and Russel.