Sequel to Don Bradman Cricket confirmed for 2016

Status
Not open for further replies.
That's fantastic news. I hope that it comes out on PC too *fingers crossed*
 
Fantastic news. And yeah I feel they should keep it to PC/PS4/XB1.
 
I heard they are going to go down the Fifa 2016 route: looking forward to "Donna Bradman 16" next year!

I can't believe I didn't hit on this before, but...

"It's Don BradMAN. Not Don BradLADY."
 
I can't believe I didn't hit on this before, but...

"It's Don BradMAN. Not Don BradLADY."[/QUOTE

Haha! Sometimes you have to wait for the good things! Its like waking three weeks later knowing the comeback line you should have used!
 
I remember reading some suggestions the Bradman name was been dropped from the sequel.

So 2 new suggestions for a sequel title.
Capturertt.PNG
Capture44.PNG
 
Ian Bell Cricket 16 would best describe whats it like to bat...
 
Like I said before; Mark Ramprakash Cricket would by far be the best option
 
jokes aside - it would be terrible to change the name/brand after establishing it.

there is just about an argument to put another more modern player on the front a-la madden, but one would assume that would require licensing from a board because e.g. Joe Root's cricket-related image rights would be held by the ECB and he'd be compensated for that in his central contract.
 
Sorry, but why some people hate Ian Bell?
 
jokes aside - it would be terrible to change the name/brand after establishing it.

there is just about an argument to put another more modern player on the front a-la madden, but one would assume that would require licensing from a board because e.g. Joe Root's cricket-related image rights would be held by the ECB and he'd be compensated for that in his central contract.

I wouldn't have thought so. I believe you could do a deal with an individual player without the board - however, if you did that, you probably wouldn't be able to use the England Kit/ECB branding on it.
 
I wouldn't have thought so. I believe you could do a deal with an individual player without the board - however, if you did that, you probably wouldn't be able to use the England Kit/ECB branding on it.

stand corrected - would have thought that they wouldn't let a contracted player be used for something like that for which there could be a collective license. my understanding is that while they could have kit supply agreements, and non-cricket related endorsements, other cricket-related ventures would be covered by an image-rights clause in the contract.

i know it works similar to that in rugby (South Hem) where the players are board-contracted.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Top