^OR bring back Yuvi or Pathan in batting unit and Varun Aaron or Vinay Kumar in bowling unit. How can we forget Vinay Kumar who has been a leading wicket taker of the Ranji Tournament for past 2-3 years.
India have to seriously look at the Jadeja option again ... Jadeja at 7 was an invaluable tool for India winning ODIs for so long. Or Better still try someone new. Ashwin is a big loss not just with the ball but with the bat too. He is good for 10-15 runs in a chase.
I think India made a mistake sending both Kohli and Dhoni in before Rahane.
I like the idea of Rohit lower down the order with Dhawan and Rahane opening. Rohit could even bat at 5, he has the game to come in and start playing his shots. Thats all he does really. Dhoni could then be 4.
Its a good idea.
Some sense here. India's main issue is that our teams are picked on media driven pressure and the IPL. If you look around the world, Jadeja has been the best spin bowling all rounder in the past 3-4 years who is still allowed to bowl. Axar Patel has done alright, but he's someone who bowls 'darts.' Jadeja has a natural variation and he's just a cricketer who makes stuff happen. His batting numbers will never be great, because he has to come and go and not everyone can be Dhoni/Ab de Villiers.
Look at Harbhajan Singh? He had a good IPL and he's there, but Rasool who's done well isn't in the picture. I'm happy for Amit Mishra because he never deserved to be dropped.
Now, on to the issue which I will get pasted for.
Instance 1: Sachin Tendulkar drops to No.4 to allow India to play 7 batsmen. He also ensures the Sehwag/Ganguly partnership at the top, not because he can't open but because they're not as effective elsewhere.
Instance 2: Rahul Dravid become a WK for India in ODI's.
Instance 3: Rohit Sharma is promoted to open the batting in limited overs to accommodate him in the side. It works wonders.
Now, I've stated these instances because all these were 'unnatural' moves, but they were done for the betterment of Indian cricket. I'm a very strong believer that Rahane has done enough adjustments and he's far too good a player not to feature in limited overs. However, he has to bat in the top 3 and Kohli is basically NO.3. He's too big a player to not warrant his own place of preference. Also, he's not at the age where he can be totally adaptable. Like Tendulkar, he can dominate but he's not your typical slogger.
In my opinion, time has come for Rohit Sharma to bat where India needs and that's at 4. My Indian ODI team would be as follows : (In batting order)
Openers-
Ajinkya Rahane
Shikhar Dhawan
Manan Vohra (Reserve opener)
No.3
Virat Kohli, period.
No.4
Rohit Sharma
No.5
MS Dhoni
I would be flexible with 4 & 5 depending upon the situation.
No.6
Suresh Raina
Reserve batsmen-
Mandeep Singh
Unmukht Chand
No.7
Ravindra Jadeja
Rishi Dhawan & Axar Patel (Reserves)
No.8
Ravichandran Ashwin, period.
No.9
Bhuvaneshwar Kumar in all matches apart from those where it's dead as a dodo. I'd opt for Mohit Sharma in those.
No.10
Amit Mishra in the sub continent, Umesh Yadav abroad.
No.11
Mohammad Shami
As expected, apart from 2-3 people, everyone here was calling for Jadeja's head apart from a couple here. The BCCI needs to appoint selectors with some stones in my opinion. I completely understand Jadeja's omission from tests, but not limited overs. Now, if they go back to him without him doing something significant in domestic cricket, then you're basically saying- 'We don't have anyone better no matter how bad you are and you're not even a Binny.'
I don't think we should demote Rohit. Rohit opening is really good. Dhawan's form is also creating the main issues for the team. Kohli should always come in at 3 after today, if Dhoni even thinks about changing the batting positions of Kohli and Rahane in the next game then I just don't see how we're going to win another game. Rahane came in at 4 in the world cup so I don't understand why he can't come in at 4 currently.