Stuart McGill

[squiz]

now heres Anil Kumbles statistics:
Overs: 4165.1
Runs: 10314
Wickets: 364
Average: 28.33
Best Bowling: 10-74
5WI: 21
10WM: 4
Strike Rate: 68.6
Economy: 2.47

Note the two main stats the Ave and SR are both consideraly better with MacGill

 

[destroyersachin]

It was wonderful to see Sehwag bash those stats.
: :cheer:

 

[601731]

squiz what are u talking about,macgill's avg. and sr. are better that kumble.

 

[andrew_nixon]

That's what he said.

 

[squiz]

Originally posted by squiz@Dec 26 2003, 05:23 PM
Note the two main stats the Ave and SR are both consideraly better with MacGill?

WITH MACGILL

 

[playjls]

macgill is class. but he is not as good as warne because he bowls too much rubbish.

 

[squiz]

yeh i know, Warne can place it in the same spot time after time, and who forget that ball of the century :o Just Brlliance

 

[playjls]

i know but gatting should have just padded it away. dont matter cos it was an absolute jaffer.

 

[Nirav85]

no the ball of the century was muttiah to Nick knight around the wicket and he bowled him around his legs...i didnt see it but i have heard alot of people said it was an amzing ball

 

[andrew_nixon]

If that was muttiah muralitharan you were talking about, it must have been some ball, because Murali has never bowled Nick Knight.

 

[Nirav85]

i am not hundred percent it was kinght but it was some batsmen that was a lefty and muli was around the wicket...pithce dit wide of leg stump and then it came back into stumps to bowl the guy and i heard it was pithced really wide and when it turned it zipped quite fast to the stumps

 

[Nirav85]

Originally posted by andrew_nixon79@Dec 27 2003, 11:13 PM
If that was muttiah muralitharan you were talking about, it must have been some ball, because Murali has never bowled Nick Knight.

Also andrew how do u know this stuff...muli and knight were in the same tourney(Natwest 2002...a tourney england would like to forget )

 

[playjls]

Originally posted by amir51@Dec 27 2003, 10:10 PM
no the ball of the century was muttiah to Nick knight around the wicket and he bowled him around his legs...i didnt see it but i have heard alot of people said it was an amzing ball

no the ball of the century was arne against gatting. it pitched miles outside leg on a good length and hit the top of off.play that

 

[andrew_nixon]

Originally posted by amir51+Dec 27 2003, 07:16 PM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(amir51 @ Dec 27 2003, 07:16 PM)</div>

<!--QuoteBegin-andrew_nixon79

@Dec 27 2003, 11:13 PM
If that was muttiah muralitharan you were talking about, it must have been some ball, because Murali has never bowled Nick Knight.

Also andrew how do u know this stuff...muli and knight were in the same tourney(Natwest 2002...a tourney england would like to forget ) [/b]

I looked it up on cricinfo.

Using Statsguru, I first selected Knight in Tests, but he had never played Sri Lanka.

Then I selected him for ODIs, used the advanced filter to show only matches against Sri Lanka, and only matches where he was bowled. I selected the view to show a list of bowlers who had dismissed him. The only Sri Lankan bowlers who had bowled him were Chandana (twice) and Vaas.

 

[Nirav85]

my friend u have too much time on your hands :

well i heard a commentator who said mulis ball was.....but for now....i will stick with muli