I think because he is a good player and People can't take it
Link.
You have not heard of racism issues in Australian crowds? WOW. Obviously the South African cricketers were lying and so was James Sutherland:
"It's embarrassing for Australian cricket that we are put in a position where this review has been implemented,".
Another link.
During the Test series with South Africa and the current one-day VB Series that also features Sri Lanka, every single one of Australia's major grounds has experienced similar racial abuse.
Sri Lanka did not formally complain at the Adelaide Oval when their players were abused, but five offenders were identified and swiftly ejected from the ground.
Maybe you will shut up now? Or will you come up with some new twist darling?
Although the remarks were widely condemned, there was a suspicion that the culprits may not have been Australian.
After all, Western Australia has a lot of white South African immigrants.
During the Test series with South Africa and the current one-day VB Series that also features Sri Lanka, every single one of Australia's major grounds has experienced similar racial abuse.
Sri Lanka did not formally complain at the Adelaide Oval when their players were abused, but five offenders were identified and swiftly ejected from the ground.
How about this or this or Monty Panesar being called a Stupid Indian?
Just a few I found with a quick search.
You must be obviously joking if you are saying that there hasn't been a single racist incident from Australia. I still maintain that although it was bad behavior by the fans and they should have been banned and arrested but being racist wasn't the intent of the Indian fans.
Fan ejected from MCG for racial taunt
Under the new regulations, fans may face lifetime bans if they are found guilty of racial abuse during a match, while the venues themselves could be stripped of international status if they fail to act on any transgressions. The SCG Trust, who are responsible for the upkeep of the ground, admitted that three people had been ejected for excessive drunkenness.
did u just read that right?Stop doing what? Booing Murali? Because Iam pretty sure thats what your going to bring up. Its not racial, its because he throws.
Jeez, some of you Indian fans are just so jealous - I love it
Lol, dont call me in denial! You guys are still convinced the racist chants and taunts never even bloody happen (well the BBCI aren't).did u just read that right?
do you go into self denial whenever australian crowds attract controversy?
I don't know what you are trying to prove here. So now those Indian crowds are racist for pointing out something that you point out? I thought racism was when you used a derogatory hyperbole to describe or discriminate against someone's race. That his features resemble a monkeys are not a definite effect of race--after all Sreesanth does not have any "African inside him" as far as I am aware. As AbBh said, this argument started out out of skin color and has quickly developed into a clutching-for-straws sort of situation. And before anyone gets too offended, if you go by evolution we are all descendants of apes.Monkey isn't about skin colour only - its about the African in you, African's have facial features that are more similar to monkey's then Indians or white people. So people, stop saying "Well Indians are brown as well, why would they tease themselves?" Because its not about that.
No, I am not trying to justify their actions. Just because you cannot counter my argument does not mean you can write it off. The only reason I'm arguing is because you are pleading counts of racist victimization on behalf of Symonds when it isn't necessarily the case, and is in fact probably not the case.No more excuses, and as much as you are trying to say you're not - you are trying to justify the actions from the Indian crowds.
That is totally irrelevant. You are missing a very simple point. If the totally hypothetical situation that I called your dad a monkey happened, I, like most Indians, would have done so for reasons not necessarily racism.(When I mean Africans, I mean African-Americans. West Indians and other countries with African ancestors. I betcha if you came to my house and called my Dad a monkey (he is African American) he would whip out his baseball bat from under his bed and smash the crap outta you)
Animator doesn't live in India, does he? And if we are supposed to know about all these supposed racial discrimination, do explain to me precisely what the differences between the varna system is in India and why people take it seriously? Since Indians should know about racist stereotypes that developed in the West, clearly you should know about why the brahmins do not want their food touched by the untouchables.Yeah "all thats been mentioned", you go ask the Indian fans who are doing why they are calling him a monkey. You can't just assume that they don't know that monkey is associated with Africans becayse "they weren't involved in the the African slave labour or that Liverpool game", because Animator wasn't involved with it and he surely knows it!
We're not defending their actions, we're merely suggesting that their abuse was not as seriously intended as you make it out to be. And I understand that it can be racist to some people (for example you) but before anyone takes offense from racism, you have to understand what position someone is coming from. For example, if I were to call someone "tissue paper" and that was an extremely derogatory or racist term in their society, I would have no clue. I would just be using it as an insult, not a racist comment.Anyways, I just wished you guys would stop trying to defend your fans actions...Its clearly racist to some people, you obviously don't understand. All I want done is for an apology to Cricket Australia and Symonds, them fans to be banned and for it never to happen again.
Really... what does "Our country [Australia] totally outclasses their country [India] in every aspect possible" have anything to do with a minority group of Indian fans abusing Symonds and being (falsely) interpreted as being racist? And you obviously ignore the fact that races are not purely based on nationality--there are at least 5 different races in India, for example (and at least 2 in Australia, as far as I'm aware). Ironically, of course, dividing people by nationality rather than race is far less controversial and something that would cause this whole debate to be flushed down the toilet.The topic is about Indian's "racially abusing" an Australian. What did I write in my post?
I write my opinion on how I would've reacted had I been in Symonds position. It's my opinion but of course I doubt you would've targetted me if I were an Indian justifying the crowd's actions, would you?
And thanks for the negative rep, sweetheart.
Are you kidding? They will all feel victimized and bring out the "aggressive", not abusive, chants when India tour Australia in the winter.well i guess you can also look at it like the aussies getting a taste of their own medicine
maybe now the aussie fans will stop too
Who made abuse acceptable? I think in our PC-obsessed society, it is important to distinguish between abuse carefully since we use different sorts of abuse to dish out different sorts of punishment.I think it is sad that in our PC (politically correct) society, one can make abuse acceptable by saying it was not on prejudicial grounds.
That is a false accusation. I have friends who were in that section that was accused. Nothing across those lines were ever said.How about this or this or Monty Panesar being called a Stupid Indian?
Just a few I found with a quick search.
You must be obviously joking if you are saying that there hasn't been a single racist incident from Australia. I still maintain that although it was bad behavior by the fans and they should have been banned and arrested but being racist wasn't the intent of the Indian fans.
How is your age got to anything to do with your race?Cricketman93
Figure it out.
What does my age have to do with anything, even?
Just because i'm young it means I can't be hurt if my country gets put in a lower light then yours? What is that if not a racist post?
You quoted my post to begin with, so yeah... You just rectifyed yourself, kiddo.And we shouldn't really care what Symonds says. If Symonds doesn't like it, he should ignore it. Follow Ben's advice, eh?
My opinion. Don't like it, ignore it.
Well when you say that of course it's going to sound pointless. :Really... what does "Our country [Australia] totally outclasses their country [India] in every aspect possible" have anything to do with a minority group of Indian fans abusing Symonds and being (falsely) interpreted as being racist? And you obviously ignore the fact that races are not purely based on nationality--there are at least 5 different races in India, for example (and at least 2 in Australia, as far as I'm aware). Ironically, of course, dividing people by nationality rather than race is far less controversial and something that would cause this whole debate to be flushed down the toilet.
There have been quite a lot of good reasons given to suggest that it wasn't the case. It's more than just a presumption.