Tendulkar v Inzamam TEST CRICKET ONLY

[Chetan0304]

Zmario I Should say You have a Great Arguing Spirit(Right or Wrong doesn't matters) Impressed

Reps..but Doesn't mean Inzi is better than Sachin -Sachin was in bad form but he will makea great comeback soon (141+ And ahead of the Legend Lara)

 

[metallics2006]

Where have I avoided a question? Show me . I am waiting.

I have proven that Inzamam is a better batsman than Sachin Tendulkar in the test arena, and I am waiting for you to dispute the facts, and I will respond to them.

So far, all you can go on and on about is Tendulkar and ODI cricket.

You have not yet answered the question wether you accept Sachin is the better ODI batsman.

We can talk about IFS all you want, but the fact is Inzamam won the game for Pakistan on the last ball. How he did it, is not up for debate.

You are a hypocrite. If you dont care how Inzy won the match, then you should'nt care how Sachin gets his runs as long as he scores runs wether the team wins or loses.

 

[SciD]

To be fair, you can't compare the two.

One is an opener, the other is a #4 and #5 batsman

Now, one of my moments in the past thing.

Pakistan touring the WI, in 2000.

Pakistan collapse (unsurprisingly) to 39/5 on day 1, thanks to Walsh and Ambrose.

Inzamam-ul-Haq is at the crease, with Abdul Razzaq.

Inzamam-ul-Haq scores 135, and takes Pakistan to 288.

If Sachin Tendulkar was in a situation where the score was 39/5, Sachin would have gifted his wicket to the opposition due to the pressue required to make a big score.

And thus, India would have been 39/6, and probably 70 all out if India were in this situation and Tendulkar was batting.

What bullshit. You obviously dont get it. Get out of your dreamland. I wonder why noone has not given you examples to fight your crappy exapmles.

Hers similar one: Inda Vs RSA in Cape Town. Gree wicket with all quick bowlers unlike WI which has road for pitches. India were 58/5 and then Azhar score 115 and Sachin made 169.

Mods please close this thread as it is just not going anywhere. It is much like Murli vs Warne.

 

[Chetan0304]

Sachin on 60* Soon to get Century!! Inzi bhai?

 

[aditya123]

Get this in your head. We are not talking about ODIs



Where have I avoided a question? Show me . I am waiting. Why is it that khalek (neutral) and Pakistani Army are saying that I have owned YOU.

We can talk about IFS all you want, but the fact is Inzamam won the game for Pakistan on the last ball. How he did it, is not up for debate.

I have shown you the stats where Inzamam averages 93.00 between 2001-2005. I have shown you where Sachin Tendulkar is YET to get a man of the match award since 1998 in test cricket.

It is YOU who has decided not to respond to them BECAUSE YOU CAN'T. You are FULLY aware that Sachin Tendulkar is NOT up to Inzamam's level in test match cricket



Are you on drugs? New Zealand is a difficult place to bat, but I see you've decided to kindly avoid that.

Inzamam averages 59.58 in NZ against Sachin's 41.50.

Inzamam averages MORE in Sachin's home than Sachin averages in his own home ground.

Inzamam averages 57.67 in the West Indies, and he played them when they had Walsh, Ambrose, and Ian Bishop in 1993.

Sachin Tendulkar averages 47.69, and he started playing them in 1997...

I'd say that WI in 1993 were alot harder to beat than Australia of 2008, but thats debatable.

Also, what do you think Inzamam faces? He was the captain of the side since 2003 to 2007, and we depended on him till Younus Khan became a better batsman.

And what the hell are you on about? Dravid, Ganguly, Laxman?

All the pressure wasn't on him, you have 3 great batsmen, 2 who are world-class.

zMario added 0 Minutes and 46 Seconds later...


Dravid contibutes and helps the team win in Test Cricket, as his average in tests shows in India wins.

Tendulkar doesn't

My last post was based purely on test cricket and I clearly stated that Dravid,Laxman and Ganguly were not the same force as they were since 2000.
Azhar was never a consitent matchwinner and suffered from long patches of being out of form.

 

[Insomniac]

Erm.

In New Zealand the ball swings, and seams.

By the way - all bowlers in NZ average 30.86 with the ball.

The overall bowling average in the game of cricket (if you take all runs scored divided by all wickets taken) is 31.78

Besides, NZ has Shane Bond and Daniel Vettori - can't be real easy, and they've had plenty of good RFM bowlers.

The outfields are fast everywhere, tell me a ground whose outfield isn't fast?

Inzamam made his only 100 in St. John's in 1993 - Between 1990 and 1999 the average bowling average was 34.50.

The entire bowling average for St.John's for bowlers in tests is now 38.37

Regarding Tendulkar's "so-called pressure". Inzamam was captain, Inzamam was the only man other than Yousuf Youhana / Mohammad Yousuf who could supprot him. The crowds always saw Inzamam and depended on him to get Pakistan out of 39/5 situations. That is something Sachin can't do.

 

[aditya123]

What bullshit. You obviously dont get it. Get out of your dreamland. I wonder why noone has not given you examples to fight your crappy exapmles.

Hers similar one: Inda Vs RSA in Cape Town. Gree wicket with all quick bowlers unlike WI which has road for pitches. India were 58/5 and then Azhar score 115 and Sachin made 169.

Mods please close this thread as it is just not going anywhere. It is much like Murli vs Warne.

Murali vs Warne was a lot closer.
Tendulkar`s role in the Indian team of the 90s was comparable to Lara`s role in the West Indian side towards the end of his career.

aditya123 added 1 Minutes and 30 Seconds later...

Erm.

In New Zealand the ball swings, and seams.

By the way - all bowlers in NZ average 30.86 with the ball.

The overall bowling average in the game of cricket (if you take all runs scored divided by all wickets taken) is 31.78

Besides, NZ has Shane Bond and Daniel Vettori - can't be real easy, and they've had plenty of good RFM bowlers.

The outfields are fast everywhere, tell me a ground whose outfield isn't fast?

Inzamam made his only 100 in St. John's in 1993 - Between 1990 and 1999 the average bowling average was 34.50.

The entire bowling average for St.John's for bowlers in tests is now 38.37

Regarding Tendulkar's "so-called pressure". Inzamam was captain, Inzamam was the only man other than Yousuf Youhana / Mohammad Yousuf who could supprot him. The crowds always saw Inzamam and depended on him to get Pakistan out of 39/5 situations. That is something Sachin can't do.

OKAY !!! INZAMAM IS THE BEST BATSMAN SINCE DON BRADMAN !

 

[metallics2006]

He was equal to SIR Don Bradman when Bradman's hands were tied behind his back. I dont agree even Sachin is as good as Bradman. So stop the Bradman comparison. Sachin is in the next level to Bradman.

 

[Karachi Xpress]

Murali vs Warne was a lot closer.
Tendulkar`s role in the Indian team of the 90s was comparable to Lara`s role in the West Indian side towards the end of his career.

aditya123 added 1 Minutes and 30 Seconds later...



OKAY !!! INZAMAM IS THE BEST BATSMAN SINCE DON BRADMAN !

I never thought you would give up so easily

 

[aditya123]

First go to a nice cricket site and do your homework. Dravid, Ganguly and LAxman became backbone of Indian midle order after 1997.

Not even 1997, more since 2000.
Dravid`s career really came of age during the 2000 tour to NZ.

aditya123 added 2 Minutes and 23 Seconds later...

I never thought you would give up so easily

Try arguing against a brick wall and check how long you`ll keep doing that.

 

[Insomniac]

Zmario I Should say You have a Great Arguing Spirit(Right or Wrong doesn't matters) Impressed

Reps..but Doesn't mean Inzi is better than Sachin -Sachin was in bad form but he will makea great comeback soon (141+ And ahead of the Legend Lara)

Yeah, whatever. good luck to Sachin Choker Tendulkar.

You have not yet answered the question wether you accept Sachin is the better ODI batsman.



You are a hypocrite. If you dont care how Inzy won the match, then you should'nt care how Sachin gets his runs as long as he scores runs wether the team wins or loses.

If I was an Indian fan, I don't care how Tendulkar gets runs as long as he takes the team to victory. So I'm not a hypocrite.

Also metallics, this discussion is about Test cricket only. Your question has nothing to do with this thread. Besides that, I asked you the questions first. You should have atleast had the decency (sp?) to answer those and then ask me questions.

What bullshit. You obviously dont get it. Get out of your dreamland. I wonder why noone has not given you examples to fight your crappy exapmles.

Hers similar one: Inda Vs RSA in Cape Town. Gree wicket with all quick bowlers unlike WI which has road for pitches. India were 58/5 and then Azhar score 115 and Sachin made 169.

Mods please close this thread as it is just not going anywhere. It is much like Murli vs Warne.

Guess what scion_sid. Who won that game? Oh thats right, South Africa did, by IIRC by over 200 runs. And IIRC, Tendulkar popped up a ball in the air in the second innings, and got out when he should have been there saving the test for India.

Nice example to pick, where he again choked!

Sachin on 60* Soon to get Century!! Inzi bhai?

Sachin scores 234, as India make only 491. Inzamam scores 122, along with Yousuf 110, Younus 101, and Kamran Akmal 72. Pakistan 583. India bowled out for 167, Sachin Tendulkar out for 3. Inzamam chases down the 92 quite comfortably to win the game.

My last post was based purely on test cricket and I clearly stated that Dravid,Laxman and Ganguly were not the same force as they were since 2000.
Azhar was never a consitent matchwinner and suffered from long patches of being out of form.

Azharuddin averages 55.48 in Indian victories.

Thats more than Ganguly and Laxman

So I've pretty much shot your theory on that down

zMario added 1 Minutes and 14 Seconds later...

Not even 1997, more since 2000.
Dravid`s career really came of age during the 2000 tour to NZ.

aditya123 added 2 Minutes and 23 Seconds later...



Try arguing against a brick wall.

Excuse me, its kind of difficult to argue against Tendu fans who believe that personal performance is better than team performance.

 

[metallics2006]

You should try reading the previous page. If you dont see my answers go see an eye specialist.

 

[Chetan0304]

Yeah, whatever. good luck to Sachin Choker Tendulkar.

WTF you are not even a worm in front of Sachin Ramesh Tendulkar how dare you to Insult his middle name :
I can't blame you it's come naturally in this type of people

I respect each player i have 10000 of ways and names for Inzi

YOU ARE A BORN IDIOT STUPID !!

 

[Insomniac]

zMario just avoids questions when the numbers clearly show that his point has been beaten comprehensively. And when you told me I avoided your story, I was gathering the stats when you typed it out. And this is my reply, if he had not hit a four and had attempted a single when the ball was within the circle, he would have been run out (more like a WALKOUT since its Inzy we are speakin' about). Sachin might have had a 25% chance of success if he was in that position. Its not worth replying to your posts. So enjoy the stats(some of which you obviously cant see) and good luck when someone else comes along to prove you wrong.

Thats not an answer to any of my questions.

Thats just your frustrations because I've shown that Inzamam is a better handler of pressure and can bat in more situations than Tendulkar can.

zMario added 1 Minutes and 15 Seconds later...

WTF you are not even a worm in front of Sachin Ramesh Tendulkar how dare you to Insult his middle name :
I can't blame you it's come naturally in this type of people

I respect each player i have 10000 of ways and names for Inzi

YOU ARE A BORN IDIOT STUPID !!

Feel free to call Inzamam Inzamam-isabadrunner-ul-Haq

Truth is, Sachin is a choker, and will always be.

 

[Karachi Xpress]

This is funny