Uh love, did you look at the overall average ?If not then why are talking about the cumulative averages of Inzamam vs India at Pakistan and Sachin vs Pakistan at India?
I'm only talking about test matches that Sachin have played in India against pakistan and Inzamam against India in Pakistan.
In 2 series Inzamam has averaged 43.80 and 60.00.
In 3 series Sachin has averaged 42.75, 51.00 and 69.50.
Out of this, when India won the series, Sachin averaged 69.50 while when Pakistan won, inzamam averaged 60.00.
zMario said:Inzamam averages 48.42 at home vs India
Sachin averages 44.15 at home vs Pakistan
Inzamam averages 54.88 away in India
Sachin averages 40.25 away in Pakistan.
Yes. it's because of the pressure factor. And no one will diagree with that. Especailly in front of respective home crowds.Dude then why only are we comparing stats of games played in India and Pakistan, is it because of the so called "Pressure of the Indo-Pak crowds"... lol
Nobody's going to agree and it's gotten to the point where the same stats are going to be used over and over again from this point so...
Inzamam is only second to Bradman.
Why would there be an LBW decision? The ball will rip through his pads, and onto the stumpsI would like to see the reactions of Akhtar if an LBW decision is reversed in favour of Sachin if Akhtar was bowling to him.
shravi said:Nobody's going to agree and it's gotten to the point where the same stats are going to be used over and over again from this point so...
Inzamam is only second to Bradman.
Yes. it's because of the pressure factor. And no one will diagree with that. Especailly in front of respective home crowds.
Why does Inzamam average more than Tendulkar IN INDIA and IN PAKISTAN?Yes. it's because of the pressure factor. And no one will diagree with that. Especailly in front of respective home crowds.
Dear, have you not yourself said that one should not go by their career averages rather one should "look closer"?Uh love, did you look at the overall average ?
Read my post, in fact love, I will quote it for you
.And the overall career stats aren't always everything, as proven by me, because if you just look closer, you find out that Inzamam is indeed the better player
And are those averages overall career statistics?Dear, have you not yourself said that one should not go by their career averages rather one should "look closer"?
Here, I quote it for you:
.
Dear, have you not yourself said that one should not go by their career averages rather one should "look closer"?
Here, I quote it for you:
.
Apparently it is, since everyone wants to play in India so badly, its now become your overall test career record!Do you mean to say that batting in India or Pakistan or your home ground is your overall test career?
How about this. They are both as good as each other, and have made members of their respective countires proud with their achievments. They both have fantastic records and are a credit to cricket, with some tremendous knocks meaning that there is no way one is better than the other
Well we've shown you all the statistics known to mankind and all the information needed, and people like khalek and Pakistani Army have made intellectual decisionsHad that come from a Pakistani/Inzy fan, most of us would have agreed and not argued.
What has spurred us on to such a reaction is that the Inzy/Pakistani fans here seem to state that Inzamam is second to none when it come to pressure and is way ahead of Tendulkar as a test batsman.
Of course limiting down the stats will prove how well the players have played according to situation and how badly they have choked when the team needed them to perform...
Read what khalek said
Inzamam is the player for ANY situation. Tendulkar is just there to score runs when not under too much pressure.