Tendulkar v Inzamam TEST CRICKET ONLY

Sachin Tendulkar vs Inzamam Ul Haq


  • Total voters
    95
Status
Not open for further replies.
Nobody's going to agree and it's gotten to the point where the same stats are going to be used over and over again from this point so...

Inzamam is only second to Bradman.
 
If not then why are talking about the cumulative averages of Inzamam vs India at Pakistan and Sachin vs Pakistan at India?
I'm only talking about test matches that Sachin have played in India against pakistan and Inzamam against India in Pakistan.
In 2 series Inzamam has averaged 43.80 and 60.00.
In 3 series Sachin has averaged 42.75, 51.00 and 69.50.
Out of this, when India won the series, Sachin averaged 69.50 while when Pakistan won, inzamam averaged 60.00.
Uh love, did you look at the overall average ?

Read my post, in fact love, I will quote it for you :)

zMario said:
Inzamam averages 48.42 at home vs India
Sachin averages 44.15 at home vs Pakistan

Inzamam averages 54.88 away in India
Sachin averages 40.25 away in Pakistan.
 
Dude then why only are we comparing stats of games played in India and Pakistan, is it because of the so called "Pressure of the Indo-Pak crowds"... lol
Yes. it's because of the pressure factor. And no one will diagree with that. Especailly in front of respective home crowds.
 
Nobody's going to agree and it's gotten to the point where the same stats are going to be used over and over again from this point so...

Inzamam is only second to Bradman.

I dont think even Sir Don could have batted like Inzi like this under pressure... Inzi is the best
 
I would like to see the reactions of Akhtar if an LBW decision is reversed in favour of Sachin if Akhtar was bowling to him.
Why would there be an LBW decision? The ball will rip through his pads, and onto the stumps :p

shravi said:
Nobody's going to agree and it's gotten to the point where the same stats are going to be used over and over again from this point so...

Inzamam is only second to Bradman.

Actually, I'd like to differ. Ok, I got nothing :p
 
Yes. it's because of the pressure factor. And no one will diagree with that. Especailly in front of respective home crowds.

This is ridiculuous, how can crowd create pressure if you are a very good batsman and you only think about leading your team to victory.

If thats the case you can see very well how Inzi has done in those situations
 
Uh love, did you look at the overall average ?

Read my post, in fact love, I will quote it for you :)
Dear, have you not yourself said that one should not go by their career averages rather one should "look closer"?:)

Here, I quote it for you:
And the overall career stats aren't always everything, as proven by me, because if you just look closer, you find out that Inzamam is indeed the better player
.
 
Dear, have you not yourself said that one should not go by their career averages rather one should "look closer"?:)

Here, I quote it for you:
.

Do you mean to say that batting in India or Pakistan or your home ground is your overall test career?
 
IPL is Tendy's overall career

khalek added 1 Minutes and 30 Seconds later...

Just to remind you guys, i have nothing against Indians or Pakistanis, i am just posting what i feel is right

looking at the stats, all i can say is that Inzi is a match winner and a genuine test player where Tendy has choked a lot of times
 
How about this. They are both as good as each other, and have made members of their respective countires proud with their achievments. They both have fantastic records and are a credit to cricket, with some tremendous knocks meaning that there is no way one is better than the other :)

Had that come from a Pakistani/Inzy fan, most of us would have agreed and not argued.
What has spurred us on to such a reaction is that the Inzy/Pakistani fans here seem to state that Inzamam is second to none when it come to pressure and is way ahead of Tendulkar as a test batsman.
 
I am sticking with what this thread is about - Lara doesn't average much in WI wins since they didn't win all that much. In 32 tests, Lara averages 61.02 when WI wins. Lower than Inzamam.

Besides, Viv Richards averages only 52.43 in games WI has won - 63 matches won. Only 19 lost, 39 drawn.

zMario added 1 Minutes and 11 Seconds later...

Had that come from a Pakistani/Inzy fan, most of us would have agreed and not argued.
What has spurred us on to such a reaction is that the Inzy/Pakistani fans here seem to state that Inzamam is second to none when it come to pressure and is way ahead of Tendulkar as a test batsman.
Well we've shown you all the statistics known to mankind and all the information needed, and people like khalek and Pakistani Army have made intellectual decisions :)
 
Of course limiting down the stats will prove how well the players have played according to situation and how badly they have choked when the team needed them to perform...

Read what khalek said :)

Inzamam is the player for ANY situation. Tendulkar is just there to score runs when not under too much pressure.

Using this way, I can prove many batsmen are better than Sachin.
for example: I can say that Masakadza (from Zimbave) is better than Tendulkar as he scored a century in his Test debut but Sachin didn't.

Its as simple as that.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Top