I had him in my mind but did not pick him as his list a and T20 stats were not good enough. Very promising batting lineup for tests but most of them are aggressive players. A test team without enough defensiveness might not work always. What do you say?
All of my players are good enough to bat in the manner that the team requires of them, so long as they are given clarity about their roles.
For Markram and Nissanka, their role is to bat until lunch; that means that they ought to be on average facing 80-100 balls most innings. Ideally more of course, but that's their role. Whether they score 20 runs or 80 in that time doesn't affect their role very much.
Then Marnus and Mendis at three and four - their job is to score big hundreds. Marnus does that all the time, but Mendis struggles because he doesn't have the same support around him in the Sri Lankan side (as well as looseness outside off).
At five and six you want more dynamic players, so again - Sarfaraz and Pope should do this role perfectly. I concede that a better bat at seven might be preferred, but Mulder is entirely competent enough.
- - -
Our ODI team is alright.
TOP ORDER HITTERS - Markram and Mendis
DYNAMIC ACCUMULATOR - Marnus
ANCHOR ACCUMULATOR - Nissanka
MIDDLE ORDER HITTERS - Sarfaraz, Pope, Rashid
FIREFIGHTER - Mulder
- - -
T20 team similarly okay:
POWERPLAY HITTERS - Markram & Mendis
ACCUMULATOR - Marnus or Nissanka
FINISHING HITTERS - Sarfaraz & Pope
UTILITY or SUPP. BATSMAN - Marnus or Nissanka
- - -
As an effort at an all-format team I am proud of it