NMA's PANESAR XI
Jim Parks Sr. (
1)
Graeme Pollock (
23)
Robert Whyte (
UD)
Bart King (
0)
Kyle Mills (
UD)
Rony Stanyforth (
UD)
Sridharan Jeganathan (
UD)
Mark Lawrence (
UD)
TEST CAPS USED (24/50)
Going for a more reliable, than deadly approach.
Jim Parks Sr. is my next pick, and he will open for me.
21,369 runs at an average of 30.74 is not exceptionally impressive, but he does provide stability to the batting as well as give the team a bowling option, for the cheap price of just one Test cap. A proper bowling option which is more than needed given I only have two good bowlers and my tail is already too long.
|Matches|Innings|Not outs|
RUNS
|
HS
|Average|100s|50s
Tests
|1|2|0|
29
|22|14.50|0|0
-
First-Class
-
|468|758|63|
-
21,369
-
|
-
197
-
|30.74|41|94
|Matches|Innings|Wickets|BBI|Average|5Ws|10Ws
Tests
|1|2|
3
|2/26|12.00|0|0
-
First-Class
-
|468| |
852
|
-
7/17
-
|26.74|24|1
"James Horace Parks, who died on November 21, 1980, aged 77, will be remembered for his feat of scoring 3,003 runs and taking 101 wickets in 1937, a record which, unless the whole pattern of country cricket is radically changed, cannot possibly be equalled."
"First appearing for Sussex in 1924, he created a sensation by taking seven for 17 in his third match, in the second innings against Leicestershire at Horsham."
"Until the Second World War he was an indispensable member of the side. In 1928 he made the first of his 41 hundreds and in 1929 helped Bowley to put up 368 in three hours, at that time a Sussex record, for the first wicket against Gloucestershire; his share was 110."
"His one Test appearance was against New Zealand at Lord's in 1937, when he opened the batting with Hutton, also making his Test debut, but, though he scored 22 in the first innings and bowled well, he can never have been a strong candidate for a place against Australia."
"As a batsman he was sound and a particularly good cutter, not very attractive to watch, but capable of scoring fast if wanted. Stockily built, he was for years a formidable opening partner for John Langridge, and had the considerable merit that no fast bowler was likely to intimidate him. He bowled slow-medium in-swingers, which, if there was any bite in the wicket, often moved away after pitching; but again he was normally reliable rather than deadly."
- - -
@El Loco, you're up