NMA's PANESAR XI

Jim Parks Sr. (

1)

Graeme Pollock (

23)

Aubrey Faulkner (

25)

Robert Whyte (
UD)

Bart King (

0)

Kyle Mills (
UD)

Rony Stanyforth (
UD)

Sridharan Jeganathan (
UD)

Charlie Parker (

1)

Mark Lawrence (
UD)

TEST CAPS USED (50/50)
Yes! I'm so relieved that
Charlie Parker didn't get picked up by anyone else, especially considering the fact that Yash. mentioned him not-so-long ago in another draft that some of ya'll are a part of.
3278 - not a tally of his runs in a handful of matches, but the number of wickets he picked-up during his 32-year first-class career. With statistics like these, why did he only play one Test? Well, he's got no one to blame but himself for that:
"Regarded during the 1920s as the best left-arm spinner in England, Parker remarkably managed only one Test in addition to his 634 first-class appearances for Gloucestershire. His temperament was largely to blame. Renowned as a rule-breaker with left-wing leanings, Parker, not surprisingly, did not get along with Pelham Warner, who was the ultimate establishment figure. Problematically for Parker, Warner was also the chairman of selectors during the 1920s.
The pair clashed in a lift at the Grand Hotel in Bristol when Parker grabbed Warner by the lapels and gave him a piece of his mind. When asked to make way in a lift for Warner, Parker reportedly said: "I'll never in my life make way for that bugger. He's never once had a good word to say for me. This so-and-so has blocked my Test career. I played once in 1921 and he made sure I never played again. Make way for him? Mr Bloody Warner will go to bed when I've finished with him." Parker held on to the lapels for almost 30 seconds before letting Warner go. "The bastard," Parker muttered as Warner scuttled off. "He alone ruined my chances." -
Fight night | ESPNCricinfo.com
-
I hope his inclusion will nullify Mark Lawrence's spot in the team, making it a ten-men xi. Him and Sridharan Jeganathan can be the two spinners of my team even though they both bowl slow left-arm orthodox, so there's no variety there. Jim Parks will be the medium-pacer that bowls through the middle overs, and King, Faulkner and Mills can hopefully be the attacking trio. Two exceptional players and one very good one too. Unfortunately, as good as the bowling might seem, my batting doesn't seem to be falling into the right place. With Kyle Mills as your number six (will be seven after my last pick, but still) you know you need a really strong top-order. Thankfully, apart from Whyte, I have that. Now here's to hoping that my last pick doesn't get poached by anyone else.
|Matches|Innings|Wickets|
BBI
|
BBM
|Average|5Ws|10Ws
Only Test
|1|1|
2
|2/32|2/32|16.00|0|0
-
First-Class
-
|635| |
3,278
|
-
10/79
-
|
-
17/56
-
|19.46|277|91
"Recommended to Gloucestershire by Dr. W. G. Grace, he joined the county staff in 1903, but not until after the First World War did he achieve real prominence. Then in every summer from 1920 to 1935, when he retired, he took over 100 wickets. In five of these seasons his victims numbered more than 200, for in 1922 he dismissed 206 batsmen."
"When pitches favoured him he could be well-nigh unplayable and by virtue of his command of spin and flight and, above all, accuracy of length, he was rarely easy to hot. His bowling feats were too numerous to be chronicled in full, but they included six hat-tricks, three of them in the 1924 season and two in the game with Middlesex at Bristol. He took all 10 wickets for 79 runs in to first Somerset innings at Bristol in 1921 and on eight different occasions obtained nine wickets in an innings."
"One of his most remarkable performances was at Gloucester m 1925 when he played an outstanding part in the crushing defeat of Essex. He disposed of nine batsmen - A. C. Russell was run out for 44 runs - in the first innings and eight for 12 in 17 overs in the second, achieving a match analysis of 17 wickets for 56 runs."
"In his benefit match at Bristol in 1922 when, on rain-damaged turf in the first Yorkshire innings, he took nine wickets for 36 runs - eight without assistance from the fielders - he hit the stumps five times with consecutive deliveries, but the second was a no-ball."
"He took part in the historic "tie" match at Bristol between Gloucestershire and W. M. Woodfull's Australian side of 1930. When the touring team, set to make 118 to win, scored half the runs for the first wicket, they appeared assured of easy victroy. Then Parker, erratic at first, exploited a worn spot with such success that the last nine rickets fell for 58. Parker came out with figures of seven wickets for 54 runs."
"It was from Parker's bowling that W. R. Hammond held eight of the 10 catches he brought off in the game with Surrey at Cheltenham in 1928."
- - -
@El Loco, you're up