I mean, I'll be okay with players never to play Twenty20 so long as it's common sense. Michael Bevan was a pre-T20 player even though he kept going a little way past 2003, but Haseeb Hameed would not really be an appropriate pick. I'll edit the OP to make it clearer before we get going.
Spot on, such a player would be fine. Taking a common-sense approach, and such a player would definitely be a "pre-Twenty20" playerjust clarifying on this - it's ok if a player retired after T20 was a thing (so post-2003) as long as they played the bulk of their career before that, and they never actually played a T20 match?
Malcolm Marshall
Malcolm Marshall is arguably the greatest West Indian fast bowler ever, having taken 376 Test wickets at 20.94 runs apiece, which is the lowest average for anyone with over 200 wickets. He generated fearsome pace with his bowling action, and had a very dangerous bouncer, which rose sharply from just short of a good length. In seven successive Test series from 1982/83 to 1985/86 he took 21 or more wickets each time, in the last five of them averaging under 20.
He was also a very dangerous lower order batsman, having notched up 10 Test fifties and 7 hundreds in domestic cricket.
His role in the team will be to open and close the innings with the ball, and strike a few blows with the bat whenever needed.
Without comparing their skill, the modern player most similar to him is Kagiso Rabada.
CerealKiller's XI
1. Graeme Pollock
2. Victor Trumper
3.
4. Stan McCabe
5. Imran Khan
6.
7. Alan Davidson
8. Malcolm Marshall
9.
10. Bill O'Reilly
11.
@Sinister One