Which for of the game are speaking of here?. Is it ODIs?. If it is, i don't see how can say that.
KP is arguably England's greatest ever ODI batsman and if in general ENG haven't been consistent ODI winners with him in the team - it has mainly been because - the ENG ODI has been crap (although KP had a few years himself in ODIs when his form dipped).
You're talking about his individual form, I am talking about his individuality not benefitting the ODI team in terms of results.
As for "how can say that", as easily as I did. It is the same base of players without him as it was with him, stints of persisting with Yardy and Shight apart.
The whole is greater than the sum of its parts, sometimes a team pulls together better when reliance is on a team effort rather than looking to mr ego all the time.
I'd suggest his value to the team is a lot less than players like Anderson, Cook, Trott, Broad and Swann for starters. I suppose at least he's not dropping six catches a series these days
How is KP way too outspoken? Baring this incident and a few twitter outburst, Pietersen has always been in line. Even Graeme Swann recently came out supporting KP decision
England news: Graeme Swann defends Kevin Pietersen one-day retirement | Cricket News | Global | ESPN Cricinfo
He has said plenty, I'm not referring singularly to this particular decision
ENG can't have it both ways, in their talk of valuing all three formats since technically by resting Anderson and Broad during the final test vs Windies (although it was warranted) - that was devaluing that test, by not picking the best available players.
They will argue that playing players into injury and fatigue is equally devaluing a Test, and to some degree I would agree. England are also at the point at which even fans are beginning to believe the depth of England bowling is very strong - Anderson, Finn, Broad, Onions, Bresnan and Swann to name six.
Haa @ the Beckham comparison. You cannot be seriously comparing the respective talents of two to the respective sporting teams.
KP is ENG's best player - Beckham was never England best football player. Get it right.
You "get it right", plenty will disagree re Beckham, and I am talking historically not now and the growingly similar situation with Rooney, and so I question whether you're in a proper position to "call that". I take your "haa" and up it "haa x infinity". Sometimes it is as simple as being a psychological overdependence on a single player that stops the other cricketers/players realising said player is not the be all and end all, they are capable of scoring runs or taking wickets and so they should focus on their game not worry about said player's absence - as England did in a 4-0 waterwash* of the aussies
*waterwash is my new name for a drubbing where the only game a team didn't win was rain affected into a no result