The Simpsons Mafia - Game Over : TOWN WIN > Player Reviews

[pcfan123]

a little birdie told me, but the bird might have been drunk, or even me for that matter

 

[MaD]

Abhas: 1

 

[ARay]

Abhas: 1

I think there are 2 votes MaD.

 

[hedger_14]

shouldn't it be a lynch

 

[riz7khan12]

same thing.

 

[BKB1991]

I am just tempted to go for Abhas too. What he pulled of in the previous game certainly pissed me off. Traitor.

Anyways will see how the rest go before making my mind. What does everyone think? The first question is that should we go for a lynch or not?

 

[ARay]

shouldn't it be a lynch

Lynch: Abhas
I think we should go for a lynch today. I really am not sure about abhas though. But I am willing to keep it just for the moment.


I probably will lynch off the most inactive player in the end of the day though.
Inactivity hurts the town. It creates way more confusion.

 

[CG123]

I wasn't part of the last game, so I have no reason to go for Abhas, but if everyone else is, I probably will.

 

[ARay]

I wasn't part of the last game, so I have no reason to go for Abhas, but if everyone else is, I probably will.

Now this quite interesting, you are willing to follow the crowd?
Wanting to fit in maybe?

 

[CG123]

Yeah, it's very interesting indeed isn't it.

----------

It's also very interesting that you're lynching someone based on the last game...

 

[MaD]

Abhas: 2

 

[ARay]

Yeah, it's very interesting indeed isn't it.

----------

It's also very interesting that you're lynching someone based on the last game...

I am lynching on the basis of a random vote. I think I have made it clear enough. The last game reason is a silly reason to justify the random vote.
Honestly a random vote needs no justification. But this is my way of doing things.

But you on the other hand, are going to follow a person who did a random vote? That to me is quite unsound logic.

 

[CG123]

But you on the other hand, are going to follow a person who did a random vote? That to me is quite unsound logic.

I actually said; "I wasn't part of the last game, so I have no reason to go for Abhas, but if everyone else is, I probably will."

So I'm not going to follow you, unless everyone else does...

It sounds like quite good logic to me, if everyone else agrees to lynch him I'll be quite happy to do so, but I'm not going to lynch him if just a couple of people are doing so.

 

[Bevab]

Not going to lynch Abhas until some proof comes.

 

[riz7khan12]

But you on the other hand, are going to follow a person who did a random vote? That to me is quite unsound logic.

Yes because a 'random' vote is logical