Tobes Graphics("D)-Request ON! Latest:....Muse sig

[punterpupnroy]

heres a 2 minute ronaldo sig

 

[KBC]

Thing is.. i really have no where to go. I am struggling to find any decent tuts. Or anything....

And KBC can you tell me why the render was bland. I put heaps of effort on the brown render.... matt reckoned the effects where good and so did i... so why is it bland,

haha, probably, you'll now it soon, you need to know a lot on blending mate, the recent ones' weren't good ( IMO) and maybe try some lighting to get over it, you need to work a lot mate, The text is not properly visible in the recent one's and it's good to see that you are tad experimenting, good, like on the garrick one, though i don't like it a bit, but the fragmented texture you've used near the text goes along well..

yeah as you may have told that you have put lot of effort on the render, but you need to get the correct blend, i'm just saying because i used to have the problem at first, but, now i don't, just like that, find a way or the other to get over the good thing over the bad, so it's really good if you browse through pixel2life, goodtutorials, etc;

Yeah, they may be a little extensive towards digital arts, but you can learn nothing less than a pro does.

Work on mate, that's the key, leave the good or the bad comments behind while taking the good out of them, and Don't get impressed by yourself, that's what every graphics maker does at first, but, i know toby is learning the process and it's great..

work on mate, Good luck !...

 

[PaulNixon1]

Can i use the ronaldo sig PPNR i just find the image of cristiano ronaldo lying on the floor funny.

 

[punterpupnroy]

Yep, you can Dan, i dont care about it.

 

[Dr. Pepper]

it's great you've started using lighting but that's a bit too much lol. very good attempt, nice textures aswell. good work

 

[mattfb]

it's great you've started using lighting but that's a bit too much lol. very good attempt, nice textures aswell. good work

I think the lighting is good except the main focus point isn't him crying on the ground. I get drawn to like no where in particular.

 

[punterpupnroy]

Heres a 5 minute Clarke sig...

 

[Dr. Pepper]

i love the idea of the squares. the bg needs more too it, you're on the right path. the text is ok, not great but not bad. render effects are nice. just needs to be more blended are more too it.

 

[mattfb]

The idea is great, the execution not quite. I dont like the text and it just looks to messy. But its your first try in this style so just keep practising!

KIU!

 

[punterpupnroy]

Heres a palmer wally....i really like it

 

[mattfb]

Great wally! Its brilliant! The effects are sensational and I love the palmer sig.

KUTGW!

 

[mattfb]

If it wasn't as smooth then it wouldn't blend :

Just because your a gun gfx maker doesn't mean you cant admit when someone has done something really well and you dont need to pick out tiny things like that to critize. If it is too smoth then it would only be by like 0.2 pixels :

 

[KBC]

It is a very important aspect of improving your graphics, reading the comments that are given to you after you have posted a sig. However, it seems that the standard of commenting is very low, with people just posting 'Nice sig' even though there could be a lot of work done to improve it. Try to post constructive comments, and then hopefully you will receive them back in doing so.

When commenting, focus on:

1. Effects - Are there a lot of effects and do they look good, or is it a simple sig with just a couple of good effects? If there aren't enough effects or too many, say so.
2. Render - What its effects are like, and how well it is blended in.
3. Lighting - Is the lightening powerful and is there a distinction between the light/dark areas.
4. Colouring - What are the colours like? Usually you would be aiming to blend two colours in well with a sig, or maybe even more.
5. Text - Does the text look good? Is the font choice good and does the style of the text suit the sig.
6. Overall look - Is it a poor sig (Could be better)/good sig/very good sig. Maybe even give a rating, and this will give an indication of how much more they can improve.

You can use the above as a guide on how to comment on people's work and hopefully you will see them improve because of your commenting. Also, don't be scared to criticize people's work, but also say why parts of it are good.

would like to say nothing more, he has sent 2 PMs already with such rubbish in it. :

Okay, sorry tobes mate, if you really feel after my comments, I'll never ever comment again..

matt, the people in graphics forums don't see any person as a beginner or professional, they just see the artworks..if you see their criticism, you would go for a suicide

Also, i only meant to help out tobie, that was very low on his standards and i was not being any pricker..

Never the less, thanks..and sorry.

 

[mattfb]

Mate I know about critism, I have been trying to get people to do that sort of commenting. I can handle critisim. I'm just saying you just had to critisize him. "The render blends but its too smooth" If it was any less smooth it wouldn't blend as well. You dont have to critize every aspect of all works, some of them are done perfectly to suit that sig or wally but they wouldn't match a different one. The render effects do match this wally though.

BTW, if you think I cant handle critisim, I can see how. I like to argue it sometimes to see exactly why they think that. But I'm never angry when I do that, just trying to understand so I can fix it (btw with this section here I'm not trying to sound like a prick lol. I just cant think of a way to say it so I wont sound like a fag )

 

[KBC]

Mate I know about critism, I have been trying to get people to do that sort of commenting. I can handle critisim. I'm just saying you just had to critisize him. "The render blends but its too smooth" If it was any less smooth it wouldn't blend as well. You dont have to critize every aspect of all works, some of them are done perfectly to suit that sig or wally but they wouldn't match a different one. The render effects do match this wally though.

BTW, if you think I cant handle critisim, I can see how. I like to argue it sometimes to see exactly why they think that. But I'm never angry when I do that, just trying to understand so I can fix it (btw with this section here I'm not trying to sound like a prick lol. I just cant think of a way to say it so I wont sound like a fag )

I can't do anything when opinions vary mate. sorry. .

But, the render could be more sharper.. if i say it's smooth, then the other thing which can be done is to sharpen it..

anyways, i don't want to get into arguments anymore..

Sorry for troubling you tobes..I'll never know if i will get an apology letter with the PMs you've sent. Not necessary though. Don't worry. I didn't care that anyway..

Keep it up mate!, expect you to .