PlanetCricket Mafia II - Day 4 (Game Abandoned)

Unlynch: Manly

Reasonably satisfied with his analysis. Could've easily thrown it together, but for now it'll do.

Ste had to be prodded a bit too much for his though, and Yashdude only seems to be making an appearance when there's talk of lynching him, plays the newbie sympathy card and sods off again.

FOS: Ste and Yashdude
 
Unlynch: Manly

Reasonably satisfied with his analysis. Could've easily thrown it together, but for now it'll do.

Ste had to be prodded a bit too much for his though, and Yashdude only seems to be making an appearance when there's talk of lynching him, plays the newbie sympathy card and sods off again.

FOS: Ste and Yashdude

Lol okay i'll respond to the first virtual prod and rouse from my slumber just to appease you next time then. :rolleyes
 
Do I need to NL to go to the next night? I feel this ground to a halt about 10 hours ago..
 
Why are you guys pinning it down to the two of us? The discussion was alright earlier. Now its simply being stretched. You guys are just allowing the mafia to fly under the radar. Swacker and I have anish and pallu, else I wouldn't have said this:



No Lynch here as well.

A correction there - Only Swacker's a miller mason. I'm simply a mason.

I can't believe Blitzberg kept calling me swacker. :/

So what happens to the other mason if one of you dies?

If anyone's played as 'masons who claimed' in a game before, how do they generally play? There seems to be a disconnect between Blitzberg and Swirler, even after claiming they're masons. I've been for a very brief moment with hedger, but after claiming we essentially were one player (and both got killed the next night) but I'm not sure how it is. Also, the two are not very experienced players.

There is nothing in my role thats says that we both die if one of us are lynched . Also neither of us turn into a vengeful masons either.

----------

Do I need to NL to go to the next night? I feel this ground to a halt about 10 hours ago..

Kind of support a no lynch as well at this point. I don't have a clear idea of who I think might be mafia; Yashdude is incredibly inactive, but can be removed later on if needed.
 
Lol okay i'll respond to the first virtual prod and rouse from my slumber just to appease you next time then. :rolleyes

Nothing to do with timing, rather that you had to be asked for an opinion on interesting developments, like two people claiming masons. Seems weird that it hadn't really caught your attention enough to mention it when you turned up.

pffft. loads of activity this morning before I wake up. Not really my fault there is little activity when I'm around.

I'm pretty suspicious of Puddleduck. His posts seem to swing a lot. Seeming eager to lynch and then not lynching. Could possibly to be trying to spread confusion and hide in plain sight?

What are your views on Yash, Swirler and Blitzberg?

Pretty cold read on Yashdude. Hasn't posted much but i didn't follow to newbie games so that could mean anything, really. Timid cop or cowardly mafia or anything else.

Not sure if I buy their joint claim either, could be true but it reeks of gambling out of panic too.
 
Nothing to do with timing, rather that you had to be asked for an opinion on interesting developments, like two people claiming masons. Seems weird that it hadn't really caught your attention enough to mention it when you turned up.

Well I didn't have much of an opinion on those developments and certainly couldn't offer anything that hadn't been covered. Didn't see the point in just repeating others and saying "maybe" a lot until someone specifically asked.

Thought I'd post to actually try and add something or raise another question, rather than make a post adding nothing just to look active.
 
@Swirler...

I do find it a bit funny that the person you're in a QT with (either mason or mafia) keeps getting your username wrong haha

Mixture of swirlier and swacker so far :lol
 
Well I didn't have much of an opinion on those developments and certainly couldn't offer anything that hadn't been covered. Didn't see the point in just repeating others and saying "maybe" a lot until someone specifically asked.

Thought I'd post to actually try and add something or raise another question, rather than make a post adding nothing just to look active.

Still, it struck me as odd. Not mentioning them and focusing elsewhere gave me the impression that you didn't think their claim was suspicious. Kind of a mafia trait to virtually ignore claims you know are likely to be true since you've got the info you need. You thought their claim reeked of panic though, so gave a bit of a mixed message to me at least.

----------

Also I think Varun might be mafia, 'cos I'm rarely, if ever, on the right track :spy
 
@Swirler...

I do find it a bit funny that the person you're in a QT with (either mason or mafia) keeps getting your username wrong haha

Mixture of swirlier and swacker so far :lol

He's only posted once, and it doesn't have much detail. :p

----------

Does get frustrating. :p
 
I think you should potentially rebrand yourself as Swirlier anyway. A new, more swirly version of your former self.
 
Before switching to "The member formerly known as Swirler."

Then... finally... "Swirl."
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top