B
2022 ICC Men's T20 World Cup - Australia
- Thread starter Na Maloom Afraad
- Start date
B
Bigby Wolf
Guest
Get this ****er out of the umpire panel now.
Bucknor, Hair, Rauf- the ones that BCCI ticked off alongside Mike Denness the match referree...
They havent launched an attack on anyone in the recent past- good time to do so now!
Sherlock Holmes
PlanetCricket's Sherlock Holmes
- Joined
- Mar 27, 2014
B
Bigby Wolf
Guest
Yeah it took me about 0.5 hr when I first saw this pic to find the fearsome tweak out of Bavuma.
Fenil
PC Cricket Leagues Legend
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2011
Hey guys. Sorry I am a few days late but I watched India vs Pakistan match and have a few questions if someone can answer because I think the rules might have changed that I am unaware of.
1) In the last of the match, Nawaz bowled a full toss which was called as no ball (deemed as beamer over waist height) but I thought beamers were given no balls only if they were at pace and Nawaz being a spinner was bowling at slower than military medium pace though with the keeper back. Isn't spinner allowed to bowl such balls because they are slower or has the rule been there for all types of bowlers all along? I have seen Yuvraj Singh get away with such balls in early 2000s as a part time bowler.
2) Runs awarded after getting bowled which was followed by batsmen running thrice between the wickets on a free hit. Granted that it was a free hit, shouldn't the ball be deemed as dead ball or runs are allowed because 'bowled' doesn't come into effect on the free hit ball?
3) Dinesh Karthik's dismissal was showed clearly as stumped as he wasn't looking for a run. Now, Pakistan's WK Rizwan collected the ball and affected the 'stumping' from in front of the stumps. I was under the impression that a keeper cannot collect the ball from the front of the stumps. Even NZ commentator and former keeper himself Ian Smith called on commentary "now where did he take the ball here?". Has the rule changed or was it a goof up from the umpire or I was under the wrong notion all along?
Can anyone who is updated with the current laws of ICC please clear my doubts?
1) In the last of the match, Nawaz bowled a full toss which was called as no ball (deemed as beamer over waist height) but I thought beamers were given no balls only if they were at pace and Nawaz being a spinner was bowling at slower than military medium pace though with the keeper back. Isn't spinner allowed to bowl such balls because they are slower or has the rule been there for all types of bowlers all along? I have seen Yuvraj Singh get away with such balls in early 2000s as a part time bowler.
2) Runs awarded after getting bowled which was followed by batsmen running thrice between the wickets on a free hit. Granted that it was a free hit, shouldn't the ball be deemed as dead ball or runs are allowed because 'bowled' doesn't come into effect on the free hit ball?
3) Dinesh Karthik's dismissal was showed clearly as stumped as he wasn't looking for a run. Now, Pakistan's WK Rizwan collected the ball and affected the 'stumping' from in front of the stumps. I was under the impression that a keeper cannot collect the ball from the front of the stumps. Even NZ commentator and former keeper himself Ian Smith called on commentary "now where did he take the ball here?". Has the rule changed or was it a goof up from the umpire or I was under the wrong notion all along?
Can anyone who is updated with the current laws of ICC please clear my doubts?
wasteyouryouth
Verified
1) Any delivery, above waist height is deemed to be unfair, regardless of speed. It used to be that slower bowlers could get away with it up to the shoulder.
2) Batter can only be out run out on a free hit, so the ball isn't dead if it hits the stumps because he's not out. Similar happened just two days before in the WBBL. 3) I believe it hit DK, so Rizwan was allowed to take the ball in front of the stumps
Till Valhalla
ICC Chairman
- Joined
- Jun 5, 2011
- Profile Flag
- Papua New Guinea
Jeez just read the 25 page of analysis.
Trying to take the easy way by asking.
Targaryen
You-Know-Who
- Joined
- Apr 1, 2014
- Profile Flag
- India
- Online Cricket Games Owned
- Don Bradman Cricket 14 - Steam PC
Simon Taufel's take on umpires on-field decision for taking that run in Ind vs Pak game. In other words, ICC indirectly responding to controversy.
sports.ndtv.com
"Umpire Made...": Simon Taufel's Verdict On India-Pakistan Dead-Ball Row | Cricket News
Pakistan team was not happy with the decision and enquired whether it was a dead ball. Now, legendary umpire Simon Taufel has opened up on the issue.
CerealKiller
Staff Member
That is obvious. It was byes. The glaring mistake is the no-ball.Simon Taufel's take on umpires on-field decision for taking that run in Ind vs Pak game. In other words, ICC indirectly responding to controversy.
"Umpire Made...": Simon Taufel's Verdict On India-Pakistan Dead-Ball Row | Cricket News
Pakistan team was not happy with the decision and enquired whether it was a dead ball. Now, legendary umpire Simon Taufel has opened up on the issue.
Targaryen
You-Know-Who
- Joined
- Apr 1, 2014
- Profile Flag
- India
- Online Cricket Games Owned
- Don Bradman Cricket 14 - Steam PC
Some people did have doubts on Kohli taking that runs since the ball hit the stumps hence should've been called a dead ball. Even players on the field were confused, few were even celebrating the wicket.
CerealKiller
Staff Member
In the heat of the moment, in front of 90k fans in such a crunch situation, because there was a wide between the so called no-ball and the 3 byes, they probably forgot about the free hit.
A.P Haux
The Meowest Avenger
Bangladesh still on top of the table after first game. Signs of them winning the wc clear enough? 
NILAYSHAH60
Dreamcatcher
Whatever happens here, both Hasaranga and Theekshana are key here. The last over of Sri Lanka's innings might prove to be the difference in this game!
Similar threads
