Unless Tremlett is injured, its pretty dumb that he has been left out for Finn who really is not suited to bowling in limited overs cricket.
Haa i cant remember the last time i saw a ODI inning where every batsman got a stars & then threw it away (except for White) SMH
I said a while back that Finn would probably be too expensive for ODIs, could be his expense is at England's if we lose a close one. Tremlett wouldn't be the worst choice to replace Shahzad, but England's problem will be the middle order and a lack of all-rounders. If they fill the middle with Yardys, Wrights and Tredwells then they are adding just half players, two might just about offer what one good player would.
Woakes bowled well, it's a shame England waited until a month before the World Cup to start trying some of these players. And instead of giving Yardy and Wright a half century of doing nothing much they could have tried to find a genuine all-rounder who could do a much better job and bat seven, or a batsman who could bowl well enough to get away with that approach - a Blackwell, Stevens or Collingwood TYPE.
If they're going to try and get away with using Collingwood as a fifth bowler then can they put Prior down the order. Collingwood at seven would be a waste, most feel Prior opening is a waste too. Why not open with Morgan and put Prior at seven?