6th Match: India v Pakistan (Group A)

[surendar]

Correct that statement. Its not the form. Its the injuries and our bowling. We`d have won y`day with a full side.

bowling - it's a form! Telling injury and no full side is just a lame/shame excuse. Pakistan was miles better than us, in all aspects(except disciplinary bowling) this time.

 

[Chetan0304]

Bad form or bad team, that's your team's problems. We don't care if you bring up any team as long as we win we will enjoy it Your team's fault for not having good bowlers and not having good bench strength.

I m not getting too much in probability, neither this is an excuse, only if UV and Zaheer were there you guys would have just hit your TV set's with the controller

 

[SciD]

Nothing to do with this match.

we'll see about that later. I'm just glad we owned you guys in this match.

What owned.

Owned is if you have 302 and India was out on 102.

 

[Howsie]

So true. :sarcasm

It's not over, even with this "INJURED" team India we will make the opponents taste defeat. only if we get our playing 11 right.

India's batting line-up is still one of the best going around even after losing the likes of Yuvraj and Sehwag, it's the bowling that won't allow you guy's to progress that far in this tournament.

 

[ali_ed2001]

I m not getting too much in probability, neither this is an excuse, only if UV and Zaheer were there you guys would have just hit your TV set's with the controller

Again, the if-then statement. As I said, it's your team which is at fault for that, we can only beat what's in front of us. That's like me saying had Wasim Akram played in 1996 quarter-final, Pakistan would have won.

 

[Chetan0304]

India's batting line-up is still one of the best going around even after losing the likes of Yuvraj and Sehwag, it's the bowling that won't allow you guy's to progress that far in this tournament.

Agree.

Zaheer's presence matter even Ishant's performance boost seeing Zaheer's line and length, also Zak walk towards Ishi and have a talk with him and it actually helps him, he's experienced you know.

 

[ali_ed2001]

What owned.

Owned is if you have 302 and India was out on 102.

owned or not owned, we won, you lost, that's all that matters. You can cry over the injuries and your bowlers all day long but it won't change that fact.:laugh

 

[SciD]

owned or not owned, we won, you lost, that's all that matters. You can cry over the injuries and your bowlers all day long but it won't change that fact.:laugh

Turn to first 2 pages of this thread and then talk to me.

 

[Chetan0304]

Again, the if-then statement. As I said, it's your team which is at fault for that, we can only beat what's in front of us. That's like me saying had Wasim Akram played in 1996 quarter-final, Pakistan would have won.

Past is Past, well played Pakistan.


It's not over yet, mate India to play two match Vs WI & Oz

Pak to play one, V Oz.

So just expect a shocking twist

 

[ammar26]

Pakistan zindabad

 

[Chetan0304]

Pakistan zindabad

Yeah!


that's all you have too say?

 

[ali_ed2001]

Past is Past, well played Pakistan.


It's not over yet, mate India to play two match Vs WI & Oz

Pak to play one, V Oz.

So just expect a shocking twist

Never said it's over. I'm pretty sure India will make some comeback in this tournament. You will easily beat Westindies, against Australia it will be close game but I expect India to win because of the batsman and Harbhajan Singh.

 

[Chetan0304]

Never said it's over. I'm pretty sure India will make some comeback in this tournament. You will easily beat Westindies, against Australia it will be close game but I expect India to win because of the batsman and Harbhajan Singh.

Man, you owned the Oz team :rtfl :laugh

 

[p.o.l]

I think the shocking twist will be that India are going to out from this Tournament

 

[Akash00]

My only one question about this game: Why Sachin (leg break!) didn't bowl when those two batsmen(Yousuf and Malik) were playing?