Bowling and batting both struggling big time and no patches out as well, I think I cant even get a refund as have played more hours then eligible for refund. Really disappointed.... I think all I can do is just wait and expect a miracle to happen.
For dbc14 I often used to say the game was like making out with a stunning lingerie model and then suddenly realising she's got a bigger Adam's apple than you... in today's world that may be considered "transphobic"* so let's say it's like eating a sublime meal and suddenly finding there was a worm in it... all 3 games have been identical in that respect, they've just had different worms.
Yesterday I had a fantastic moment in a tough chase. Having recovered from a jittery start chasing 438 I'd posted a 100+ 5th wicket partnership, when there was a huge shout for lbw that I thought looked stone dead, given not out. No reviews in my format but I went to ball tracking, hit just inside the line and taking out middle and off. Checked the replay, and I've been saved by a thin edge off the inside bottom corner of the bat... phew. What a moment, what a game.
That player, in the 60s or 70s at the time went on to make an unbeaten 228* and take me to a tense 1 wicket win. Amazing.
Except... the 4th inns bowling AI is utterly broken. They change the field much more often than than first 3 inns, often every ball. Worse, they don't attack even with 438 on the ball. Worse, they start attacking when your batsman passes 25 and keep attacking when he's passed 200 and there's 30 to win. He was facing a more aggressive field when 130-odd than a batsman who'd just come to the crease after the fall of a wicket. And batting is definitely much much easier - sure it was a favourable batting track and I certainly got some edges (including the one that saved my lbw!) but you never felt there was one with your name on it like in 14 and 17. It was a sense of concentrate, accumulate, and you'll chase this down. (I was 9 down in part thanks to 2 stupid run outs, and other mistakes like playing back to a full ball and getting castled, and deciding a first ball slog made a lot of sense.)
I've been banging on about the broken 4th innings AI since dbc17 and all through the beta. As @Dutch said there is little or nothing people are bringung up that wasnt discussed or flagged in beta, often at great length.
*2014 - simpler time.
Backfoot drive through point is probably my new favourite shot.You can play an odd backfoot shot, especially the through Point but it is rare. On the whole batting off the backfoot is quite under-powered and feels nerfed. I'm not saying DBC 14 was perfect and didn't have its issues but to me it was the closest to being the perfect cricket game, and in fact if DBC 14 base was carried over for the other iterations, we would be in a far better position.
Some of the nuances DBC 14 captured so well - difference in difficulties (from Amateur to Legend), batting, changing length via RS, catching using RS and dropped catches, career mode with correct stats and reward for better performance (you skilled more after better performances) - etc. were spot on. I still don't understand how we could've taken a step or two back in some or most of these areas despite two more iterations of the game since DBC 14. I simply don't see enough progress for the franchise since DBC 14 days and that's frustrating to see as a cricket gaming fan.
Just delete decals, profile folders i guess and remember unselect the steam cloud check box.
Backfoot drive through point is probably my new favourite shot.
Backfoot drive through point is probably my new favourite shot.
They have different models for men and women, this is why the kits can't be transferred.It's dawned on me today why the male batters all have mini bodies. It's because of women being included and the developers haven't made separate templates for the batters. So, the male batters are all slim waisted, narrow shouldered dwarfs with massive heads.
Just compared them to the previous versions of the game. In dbc 14 through to dbc 17, the batters are all normal height with normal bodies.
It's dawned on me today why the male batters all have mini bodies. It's because of women being included and the developers haven't made separate templates for the batters. So, the male batters are all slim waisted, narrow shouldered dwarfs with massive heads.
Just compared them to the previous versions of the game. In dbc 14 through to dbc 17, the batters are all normal height with normal bodies.
Can you like, take a screenshot of your game or something? I really want to see if all your players look like dwarfs...