CerealKiller
Staff Member
Moderator
Fantasy Cricket Team
PAK...
Kings XI
Islamabad
PlanetCricket Award Winner
Avengers
But have the umpires always been right? We have also seen instances of the fielding team unable to pick up the snick due to external noise. So kudos to him for walking.
If it's a genuine dismissal then it stands to reason that the batsman should go back to the pavilion - more so when you, as a batsman, know that you've knicked it. It didn't look like India would have gone for a review, so that makes it that much more special on Zaman's part. In the end, having correct outcomes is what the sport would want.
As I said, on a human level, I respect him for his decision.I agree with you on this being a job for the umpires. Upon watching the replay it seemed very obvious that Zaman had nicked it and it was a surprise that the Indian side did not appeal straightaway. The batter also had the right to stand his ground in this scenario.
But as I said earlier though, I wouldn’t have expected anything different from Zaman as he is a truly classy player. Sometimes more than the outcome it is your actions that matter and give you a reputation. Five to ten years down the line he will still be remembered for walking off in a heated rivalry match in a continental tournament rather than any extra few runs he would have scored before being dismissed given how good the Indian bowling attack was yesterday.
But from a competitive perspective, no need to walk. Take all the advantage that the rules give you.
I don't buy into this argument that sometimes you shouldn't take advantage of the rules because of "the spirit of the game". In that case, those rules that, when followed, cause a player to go against "the spirit of the game", should simply be changed.