Please don't tell me that this was a sudden news for Bumrah. He was well aware of the due date of his wife. He could have put in a request stating that he'd join post the birth. The fact remais that even after returning injury he hasn't proven himself. If players, who stay out for a year keep taking leaves every now and then, how are we expected to field an XI that will play the 1st game of the World Cup? Kohli missed the remainder of the tour in Australia- he didn't come back. Bumrah could have not flown at all OR can stay back for all he wants now!
As for Sharma and Kohli- are they so above the game that they will now pick and choose when and where they will play? Flying to WI and not playing the ODIs- look at the form they are in. It isn;t cheap shots- it is the reality of Indian cricket today that they are taking their place in the national team for granted. They haven' gotten homesick cause of the many breaks they have take over the past year.
As for the child birth- assume,hypothetically, that both Ms Sharma and Ms.Kohli were expecting their children and they both go into labour a day before the World Cup Final. In this case, do Rohit and Virat miss out on playing???
Prioritizing family isn't wrong. However, it is now coming at the cost of the team's interest and their own place in the team. When MS' daughter was born, he could have gone, as there was no challenger to his place. Also, MSD didn't miss out a year. Ditto with Kohli. However, the scenario now is different.
The expected delivery date doesn’t have to match with the actual date though. Think I can count the number of times that I’ve seen it happen on my hand personally. Kohli also played the entire white ball portion of the tour and the first test didn’t he? By your logic he shouldn’t have played those games either. I’ve already said back then that there was a hidden hierarchical issue given Kohli was allowed to skip the last three tests while Natarajan opted to stay despite having the same reason. Yet again he’s missing one game against Nepal that may not even happen due to rain, it’s silly to doom the WC campaign on the back of it.
I’m not a fan of what happened in West Indies but I don’t see how Kohli is to blamed for it when he’s no longer the captain. I also said back then that whilst it was risky it was also understandable what Rohit was doing. We’ve been giving far too much importance to bilaterals for far too long instead of using them to build teams and it’s time we stopped doing that even if the results of it won’t bear fruit until the next cycle.
I hate comparing scenarios in this instance too, if Dhoni didn’t leave then it was a decision that he took for himself, expecting others to go by his standards is unfair. To answer your hypothetical, I wouldn’t begrudge anyone who had to choose between those two events and if someone were to prioritise their child’s birth over a final then I say more power to them. Cricket is a sport where you’re sacrificing a lot of time for long periods away from home and family in general.
To point out how much of a non issue this whole thing is, Neesham’s just skipped out on an entire tour for the same event and he’s a WC probable too. Haven’t seen anyone criticise him for it and rightfully so.